主题:【原创】美丽的杜克大学(Duke University) -- 润树
在回答你的诘问以前,我先要承认,在我写下你引用的那段话时,是不严谨的,与事实有出入。但事实是对杜克大学和先生你的观点较为不利:是杜克官方先与尼克松提出谈判将尼克松图书馆建在杜克。下面这段话引自杜克官方网站:
In July 1981, Terry Sanford initiated negotiations with former U. S. President Richard Nixon (Duke Law '37) to locate the Nixon presidential library on the campus of Duke University, Nixon's alma mater. When this information was revealed to faculty members during the week of August 10, 1981, many opposed the proposition, citing Sanford's failure to consult the faculty prior to initiating negotiations.
Many who opposed the library had moral objections to memorializing a President whose behavior in office was reproachable, and they feared a negative effect on the university's reputation. Other concerns included the effects of increased tourist traffic on campus and the uncertain aesthetic nature of the proposed structure. However, supporters of the Nixon Library argued that the scholarly and academic benefits of locating the Nixon Presidential Materials collection on campus should and would outweigh other concerns. These supporters tended to denounce the actions of vocal dissenters as divisive and arrogant.
Meetings of the Academic Council and Board of Trustees during September and October 1981 were dominated by the Nixon Library debate, and a group of faculty formed the Committee Against the Nixon-Duke Library (CANDL) to organize the efforts of faculty, students, alumni, and others opposed to the proposed library. Although the Academic Council voted not to pursue further negotiations with former president Nixon in a 35-34 decision at a September 3, 1981 meeting, the Board of Trustees later voted 9-2 to proceed. By April 1982, negotiations had stalled. One year later, Nixon's representatives announced that a site at Chapman College in San Clemente, California, had been chosen for the Richard M. Nixon Presidential Library.
Terry Sanford是当时杜克的校长,首提图书馆之议。尽管遭到许多教职员的反对,校董事会之学术参议会也以35比34票的一票之差否决与尼克松继续谈判,可是校董事会后来仍以9比2的绝对多数支持谈判继续进行(吾道不孤呵!)。此后是尼克松方面决定将图书馆建在自己的出身地。当然这个决定很可能与尼克松对杜克提出的条件不能满足,以及考虑到来自某些杜克师生的反对有关,但显然如果尼克松让步,事情就成了,这样我也就不知道用什么话来支持先生你的义正词严。
另外我的母校没有出过希特勒,也没有听说要建希特勒图书馆,恕不能回答此种虚拟的问题。还有你似乎有把尼克松比作希特勒的倾向,愚意以为很不妥,你如果能仔细想一想,可能也会认为不妥。当然你可能一开始就没那个意思,只是你问题的基础也就不存在了,是不是呢?
我用了“一度”这个词,是感觉到美国民众对尼克松的态度在逐渐向好的方面转变,到他1994年去世时,美国为他举行了隆重的国葬,也算是备极哀荣。当然美国人民对他所犯下的罪行,是不可能忘记的,因此仍然可以说他现在还是“声名狼藉”,那我就承认用词不当。但一个“声名狼藉”的人却可以享有崇高的荣誉,似乎又不是那么逻辑相洽,我觉得。至于你在提到撒谎作弊时的义正词严,我在表示滔滔不绝的敬意之余,偏头一想,这世界上有几个不撒谎作弊的政客呢,区别在于事情大小和抓到没抓到把柄罢了。不知做为中国人或非中国人的你,对此作何想?
最后再回到尼克松图书馆的话题。1974年底,美国政府做出决定将尼克松在任期间所有的文件资料暂时收入国家档案馆,以利于水门事件及相关事件的进一步调查。因此当1990年尼克松图书馆在加州落成时,只收藏了他在总统就任前和卸任后的资料,而且没有得到国家的财力支持。2004年,国会作出决定,在将早前国家档案馆收藏的资料与尼克松图书馆的资料合并后,将尼克松图书馆收归为美国的第12个总统图书馆及博物馆。今年7月11日,该馆正式纳入国家档案馆系统管理。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂嘿嘿,Duke把尼克松图书馆拒之门外 1 MacArthur 字630 2007-08-05 12:40:09
😄我们当时还觉得把学院名儿卖便宜了呢 1 holmers 字632 2007-08-06 11:16:55
🙂美国大学的校长其实就相当于大公司的CEO MacArthur 字50 2007-08-06 11:52:59
🙂哈哈,真是义正词严
🙂你需要对美国大学制度多一些了解 1 MacArthur 字679 2007-08-05 17:33:16
🙂先道个歉 2 润树 字1083 2007-08-05 22:41:39
🙂请教一下 老马丁 字42 2007-08-05 09:51:15
🙂都在西校园,步行十来分钟吧 2 润树 字65 2007-08-05 10:15:35