主题：碳排放机制是个大忽悠么？ -- 罗博
共:💬26 🌺3
总结如下：
The demand for carbon credits comes mostly from within the ETS, from polluters who need certificates allowing them to emit carbon. There is some demand from Japan, which has a voluntary scheme, and from companies and individuals elsewhere in the world who want to offset their emissions for moral reasons, or to make themselves look good.
就是说作CDM的动机很多是欧洲或者日本企业，他们为了做branding或者企业的社会责任的目的，购买排放权，并不是真心为了降低全球的温室气体排放。Credits costing less than 1 to produce have been sold on the market for up to 11. Factories have found that their damaging by-product, HFC-23, can be more valuable than their main output.
还出现逆向选择的问题，中国企业不是去减排，而是寻找HDC-22的替代品，那玩意儿的效率和价格比CO2强多了。
此外，
Chinese CERs are too cheap and the carbon price is too low and too volatile. Even when it was bouncing around at 15-25, it did not seem to encourage much new investment.
中国的排放太便宜，使得Phase I的价格非常低，没有起到鼓励大家减排的目的。最后还发现，Economist持一贯的有色眼镜看中国的发展，虽然文字安排很巧妙
关键词(Tags): #Economist，
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 6 层
🙂也不能什么都是发展中国家吃亏 橡树村 字92 2007-11-13 06:22:12
🙂关于新能源，我已经发过帖子进行讨论 罗博 字104 2007-11-13 06:05:49
🙂我记得是这篇不太确定，这里的连接是。 ljly 字114 2007-11-13 06:12:33
🙂这篇文章指出一些问题
🙂此外 罗博 字314 2007-11-13 07:25:23
🙂小弟也是刚开始对清洁能源干兴趣，随便说说 ljly 字22 2007-11-13 07:16:34
🙂no,no本人就是门外汉，以前完全没有接触过这东西 罗博 字44 2007-11-13 07:31:33
🙂初步看了一下 罗博 字107 2007-11-13 06:45:33