主题:Fed provide financing to BSC -- 江南听雨
似乎最有可能的是LEH吧。 翻着了这篇,没翻译。
Perhaps the most interesting part of all of this is that Lehman recently announced a share repurchase of 100 million of its shares for a cost of $5 billion or so. At the same time, it floated a preferred stock deal at 7.95% and issued billions of dollars of new debt for itself. This occurred just as the firm's mortgage and other debt related write-downs began that will likely run into the tens of billions of dollars. In other words, rather than de-leveraging, it's adding leverage. I guess this is why my firm is short Lehman debt.
The same goes for Bear Stearns (BSC) and many others. To prove the point, what do you think would happen if Lehman and Bear were told by regulators to sell its ‘hard to price’ assets? I find it highly doubtful it would be able to sell them and hence, this leads me to question their solvency. What about the other $600 billion of assets on Bear's balance sheet? Could it sell them? Doubtful. The reason is that everyone else owns the same type of securities and the company is being instructed to sell, yet cannot. So the ‘daisy chain ‘has started whereby when one firm is forced to sell, it must ‘mark to market’ which means everyone else who owns the same security has to mark theirs down as well.
不过BSC完没完还两说呢。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂好问题 江南听雨 字87 2008-03-14 22:44:40
🙂是的,Bear Stearns有流动性麻烦 3 张家兄弟 字1503 2008-03-14 08:11:19
🙂-45%, 开眼了啊 江南听雨 字0 2008-03-14 07:28:10
🙂-35% 江南听雨 字6 2008-03-14 07:24:59
🙂哇哇 熊死蹬刚刚看来是回光返照了 江南听雨 字14 2008-03-14 07:19:16