主题:【原创】碰撞测试-便宜的车也耐撞(添加照片版) -- 波波粥
用星星表示容易理解,再简化成日本车美国车的安全性就更好了。什么漏洞都比不上懒人脑子里的漏洞。
这种测试条件有个问题,是政府搞的,必然有工业界游说的因素,并不完全是站在消费者的角度,说不定哪里就有猫腻。保险公司的测试,也不知道有什么spin。如果Consumer Reports做测试,可能会好一些。
消费者至少可以读一读小字。Mini Cooper比F150安全,无论汽车厂还是测试机构,都不太可能撒这种谎,还是要消费者自己告诉/欺骗自己。
Can I compare vehicles from different classes?
Side crash rating results can be compared across all classes because all vehicles are hit with the same force by the same moving barrier.
Rollover ratings can also be compared across all classes.
Frontal crash rating results can only be compared to other vehicles in the same class and whose weight is plus or minus 250 lbs of the vehicle being rated. This is so because a frontal crash rating into a fixed barrier represents a crash between two vehicles of the same weight. Examples:
* It would not be permissible to compare the frontal crash results of a 4,500 lb SUV with those of a 3,000 sedan (different classes and exceeds the weight requirement).
* It would not be permissible to compare the frontal crash results of a 3,600 lb pickup with those of a 3,400 lb van (meets the weight requirement, but different classes).
* It would be correct to compare the frontal crash results of a 3,400 lb passenger car with a 3650 lb passenger car (same class and meets the weight requirement).
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 2 层
🙂厂商都是要追求最大利润的 橡树村 字376 2008-05-10 09:58:54
🙂我盼着中国制造贵起来 波波粥 字206 2008-05-10 11:40:39
🙂只要有标准的测试,就有漏洞 胡一把 字184 2008-05-06 22:05:11
🙂高分低能罢了 滴语 字0 2008-05-03 19:13:06