主题：中西醫之爭的實質是中西文化之爭，關鍵在於以誰的標準來衡量 -- 瀛洲海客

"A sort of universal language or script, but infinitely different from all those projected hitherto, for the symbols and even words in it would direct the reason, and errors, except for those of fact, would be mere mistakes in calculation. It would be very difficult to form or invent this language or characteristic, but very easy to understand it without any dictionaries."

The concept was a bit high-flown for his time, and Leibniz' idea was ignored by the scientific community of his day. He let his proposition drop - until about ten years later when the Chinese 'Book of Changes', or 'I Ching', came his way.

Leibniz found some sort of confirmation for his theories in the I Ching's depiction of the universe as a progression of contradicting dualities, a series of on-off, yes-no possibilities, such as dark-light and male-female, which formed the complex interaction of life and consciousness. He reasoned that, if life itself could be reduced to a series of straightforward propositions, so could thought, or logic.

另外，就算萊布尼茨不是受易經啓發。但是兩千多年前易經的思想和17世紀萊布尼茨的思想，明明有相同之處，何以一個被貶為江湖騙術，一個被尊為科學的偉大發明？你們各位“理科生”何以一定要貴西而賤東？這就是你們的民族自信心？