主题：【原创】经济学读书心得 -- 科大胡不归

再好的理论，如何付诸实施是个大问题。用根本不按照理论来做的实验来否定理论，是非常可笑的。

看看“华盛顿共识”的内容，和现实的拉美实行的如何，就会知道原因何在。

更加有趣的是，中国改革以来的经济动力，更多是在“华盛顿共识”明文提出的重点。

还是那句老话，没有东方和西方不同的物理学。

至于“北京共识”，普里高津的高足，已经被陈志武痛批过了，我也懒的落井下石。

Below is a misleading article by Chen Ping: http://www.jingjixue.com/wmnewshtml/1/2005-05-23/20050523215916.html This kind of garbage reflects his misunderstanding of economics. It only serves to self-glorify. There is no such a thing as "China's economics". That is total b.s. The economists at the CCER and other places in China have never developed a consistent framework for analyzing economic issues, so that nobody knows what it means by "China's economics". What is the core of "China's economics"? Besides the analytical framework borrowed from the west by people like us, economic research in China has not come out of the traditional "everything goes" wonton-plus-wonton-equals-wonton method. It seems that having been trying to kiss the backend of the Chinese government, the CCER has become much more self-serving than I thought. Other than Qiren, the other key players there are all too busy trying to kiss the government. This is the danger of the CCER style of promoting "economic research": you lose your independence way before you know it. I just don't understand why LIN Yifu and Chen Ping spend all the time talking about "China's economics", when there is no such a thing and when there is not even a minimum amount of ground work that has been done to define the core of "China's economics". They should focus on doing more real hard work, rather than dreaming of the Nobel Prize every day. Zhiwu Chen 2005-05-25

这个链接

http://www.beiwang.com/bbs/showtopic-4445.aspx