主题:【文摘】擅自转贴---温相谈李志绥的《毛泽东私人医生回忆录》 -- nan
共:💬76 🌺21
that certainly is a possibility.
but all i was trying to say is that one cannot
use the "breaching-of-confidentiality" argument
to discredit Li or his book when in fact his book
has already offered a perfectly reasonable
explanation for it. of course if you have solid
evidence that can undermine the credibility of
the explanation itself, then that's a different
story.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
即承认毛的伟大, 也相信李的说法. 鲁者 字423 2004-05-27 21:30:52
in defense of Dr. Li huamei 字257 2004-05-25 22:27:41
😄in defence of Mr.Mao 舞干戚 字68 2004-05-26 00:13:33
😜sure, but...
好逻辑,好视角,再补充对这本书的评论 查理五世 字718 2004-05-25 22:37:24
毛泽东?上官云珠?京夫子?文工团?萧华--兼复菜九段 3 天可汗 字3509 2004-05-25 06:52:22
【原创】正看李的回忆录,也说两句 lzyjt 字126 2004-05-30 23:05:20
😁上官云珠一事已经是公开的秘密 查理五世 字224 2004-05-24 20:22:39