主题：【文摘】海地--一个失败国家的历史 -- wolfgan
渊博谈不上，乱翻书而已
no need to be so modest. 英国一向是注重实利，不重虚名，与其直接控制，耗费人力财力，不如在经济上倒入英国主导的自由贸易体制，这样收益最大，成本最小。
Very few people can summarize it into such a concise sentence and put it so eloquently. Too much modesty=hypocracy.
You give a smart comment with insights--then thumbs up for you together with respect, but without jealousy. It is the American/German way. I
I do not like your Chinese way of hypocracy.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 6 层
🙂拉美独立是大英帝国的外交大手笔 3 李寒秋 字290 2010-01-19 05:39:45
🙂这段历史不太清楚。 wolfgan 字68 2010-01-19 05:43:16
🙂渊博谈不上，乱翻书而已 3 李寒秋 字562 2010-01-19 05:52:11
🙂a very chinese reply
🙂thumbs up. And added comment 6 parishg 字1987 2010-01-19 23:30:41
🙂你错了 1 镭射 字108 2010-01-18 11:43:05
🙂那么请问，子产的后人写一本书 3 楚庄王 字276 2010-01-17 21:03:51
🙂外部势力对拉美国家定没有压倒性的优势。 4 wolfgan 字499 2010-01-17 21:15:56