主题:怪不得经济学家臭大街:《经济学人》称印度超越中国迟早的事 -- 加东
回复远比文章本身有趣。西方的明白人还是不少的,比如这位FirstAdvisor:
他(她?)甚至知道中国的村级选举,好像还很了解:
如果这位真是老外,那他实在知道得太多了
还有人总结了文章的修辞手法:
Oct 22nd 2010 2:09 GMT
"Disastrous, brittle, unraveled, unknown, monolithic, wrenching, secretive, eerie, obscure, excessive, glacial, explosions, discontent, resentment, callousness, grip on dissent, nationalist, irrational, paranoid, introspective, imperial, awkward, disappointing."
These are selected words you used to describe China throughout the article.
I'm no 50-cent party member, but this hysterical hyperbole lends itself to casual dismissal by those with a tendency to rational middle-ground seeking.
有人认为这文章坏了《经济学人》名声:
Oct 23rd 2010 3:22 GMT
After reading several posts, it seems that their is wide consensus on the part of the Economist readers that this article is embarassingly poor. It is frankly an insult to the Economist's reputation and to the intelligence of its readers to publish such a pathetic article, full of misleading and malicious content such as comparing Xi's sucession with that of Kin il Eun.
不过似乎《经济学人》在中国问题上的名声早就不咋地了:
Oct 22nd 2010 6:37 GMT
When it comes to writing on China, the Economist is hopelessly pathetic, shamelessly propagandist, ridiculously self-righteous, excessively antagonistic, and foolishly insulting to the intelligence of its readers.
In so doing, the Economist has helped solidify the Chinese people's sense of suspicion of the West and doubt about the merits of unruly democracy and irresponsible freedom of speech.
Oct 21st 2010 4:51 GMT
The Economist shows its skewed-up views every time when it publishes an article about China. You cannot be taken seriously when you equate the Chinese succession to that of North Korea's. It reveals how hysteric the West is about towards today's rising China, especially in Briton where people heads are still stuffed with their by-gone imperialism bs.
最后,终于有人受不了《经济学人》这本杂志了:
This will be my last post to the Economist.
......
As to my first point, I surrender. There truly was a day when the Economist had stature and respect. Today, in my view, it is little more than another National Enquirer, a Right-Wing neocon rag producing little more than smart-assed flame-baiting drivel.
I will never look at another Economist in print and I will not return to this website. And yes I know you don't care; your right-wing constituency will always love you, and you will sell ads. Hair on ya.
看了西方人民的眼睛也是雪亮的啊
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂等一百年吧。 3 云无心而出岫 字0 2010-10-30 02:21:22
😜经济学人前读者飘过...请邮寄给我一本货币战争 1 什刹海良民 字0 2010-10-29 13:12:53
😮“经济学人基本上不涉及政治话题”?你确定你看过这个杂志? 16 加东 字176 2010-10-29 06:49:39
😜回复远比文章本身有趣
🙂西方很多人的脑袋非常sharp dolong 字68 2010-10-29 21:28:05
🙂“经济学人基本上不涉及政治话题”? 喜欢辣椒 字118 2010-10-29 15:14:43
🙂呵呵,加兄认真就输了。老观你知道吧,不说了,你懂的。 云无心而出岫 字0 2010-10-29 07:00:06
🙂也要看人口增长率吧, 2 咪铛 字81 2010-10-28 20:32:13