主题:【原创】围绕脑科学而发生的若干玄想 -- 鸿乾
1.
http://www.ccthere.com/article/3831661
"我确信人们在未来数个世纪会将继续学到这样的教训:“所有的历史经验”,Max Weber(马克思.韦伯)写道,“一再的表明人们在还未触及不可能之前是无法触及可能的!”
2. 人丰富的感情(such as anger) =poor logic, kind of, in a way
basically 人电中性, like 原子(电中性) and still 产生相互作用力, and qm gives us 价键理论 to deal with that
"到20世纪中叶,几乎所有的量子化学计算都是采用分子轨道理论进行的。这种局面在20世纪末与21世纪出发生了一定的变化。现代价键理论采用原子轨道线性组合产生价键轨道的方法,可以达到和分子轨道理论方法相似的精度。"
3. but
"然而,由于价键轨道的非正交性等原因,价键理论的数学结构依然比分子轨道理论复杂得多,程序比较少,而相同精度的计算往往需要更多计算资源,所以价键理论目前仍然不太常用"
so, 电中性"人子"(like 原子产生相互作用力)= a boiling "markov heat bath", kind of like "white noise"@ harmful level, in a very general sense
4. per SR, we human being as a system (better than SR, I would think) should feel the heat from "markov heat bath", but we don't understand it, so we become emotional:
狹義相對論
"一个系统如果保持相同的静质量,它必须是封闭的,以致没有能量(可能是热或辐射)可以逃离该系统。外力可以改变该系统的动量和能量,但该系统的动量和能量的改变可以维持静质量不变。当某些反应将组成该系统的某些粒子的静质量转换成光能或热能,只要这些光能或热能无法从该系统逃离,该系统的静质量便不会改变。只有在这些能量被释放到该系统周围的环境,该系统才会失去静质量"。
5
so, where to get 薛定諤's negative entropy so we could survive "markov heat bath"?
not from outside of system (such as heaven), there is no "outside" of system, it has to be a 紧黎曼流形, or our model is not good enough, short term, at least, no god
long term, "communist society or god", whatever, or total dealth in a keynesian model"..
so short term, we try to get negative entropy from each other, but via "fair competition", kind of..
so, "脑控", bad or good? who knows
6. now, about "脑控", locally feasible?
in general, 脑's environment=引力场(socially, more of gr version)+conventional 热力学
and "引力波"屏蔽,热辐射屏蔽=impossible
5. but locally, never say never
socially, "治大国若烹小鲜" is not new (not really targetted at tg, every political ruling regime does that), one way or another, intentionally or not intentionally, or you could say we are playing a game of 达尔文进化论..etc...not really new
but as a "scientific system"? locally very feasible, but you need to get your "non sr macro qm" theory and hopefully experiments set up first
------------------
a mini model 4 "引力波"屏蔽干扰, +热辐射屏蔽干扰="脑控"?
隐身衣技术III:隐身 [ witten1 ]
http://www.cchere.com/article/3218652
我跳过光学变换的进一步技术性讨论,其实总得就是一句话,我们要求Maxwell方程的协变性,就是说我们要求Maxwell方程在坐标变换下是不变的,这样把介电和磁导率张量做相应的变换的时候其实就是意味着我们寻找一类特殊的边界条件来达到我们引导光线弯曲前进的目的,通常引力会比较容易一点,可是人工引力在目前的技术条件下应当是不现实的,因为这是直接改变时空的结构,而改变引力场也就是改变周围环境的曲率,所以通过利用一些材料的特殊性质实现特定的介电和磁导率的变换也是能达到等效的功能
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂非常好。正是我想说的,最简单的解决问题的能力是根 鸿乾 字526 2013-02-06 10:13:06
🙂一个河里的老帖,和这里的讨论很相近,链接过来 2 鸿乾 字1639 2013-01-29 18:01:18
🙂长远看人脑会堕落成为感官的接受器 5 川普 字1672 2013-02-03 21:54:38
🙂"脑控"的结果 (科幻)
🙂人丰富的感情=poor logic 墨虎 字261 2013-04-28 12:39:07
🙂如果你能站立在波涛滚滚的海面上 1 晓兵 字3700 2013-04-28 23:04:25
🙂"引力波"屏蔽,热辐射屏蔽=impossible 晓兵 字223 2013-02-06 17:47:06
🙂我更乐观一些。人脑是首脑,是创造的核心,这个事实不会改变 2 鸿乾 字1736 2013-02-05 12:39:37