主题:【原创】南亚一瞥:印度斯里兰卡游记 (1/4) -- 顾剑
Most contemporary anthropologists classify Indians as belonging to one of four major ethno-racial groups, which often overlap with each other because of a continuous process of racial admixture: Caucasoids, Australoids, Mongoloids and Negritos. The Caucasoids are largely confined to the north and generally speak Indo-Aryan languages; Australoids are found in the south and generally speak Dravidian languages; Mongoloids are largely confined to the Northeastern region of the country and for the most part, speak Tibeto-Burman languages; and Negritos are found on the Andaman Islands located on the southeastern side of the country. These speak a group of languages known as Andamanese and Ongan languages, linguistic isolates not related to any known languages. And finally, Austro-Asiatic languages are spoken by only tribals or Adivasis, who can be of either Australoid or Mongoloid racial stock.[10]
Caucasoids可能还算是高加索后裔,那其他(Australoids, Mongoloids and Negritos.)的都和无论广义和狭义定义白人都没有关系,从我接触到的印度人来说,后三种的比例也要远高于第一种。
关于白人与土著的后裔的说法不知道混血的后裔的比例有多广泛。北方高加索裔的统治者也没有长时间的对印度南方进行完全统治,加上种姓制度,印度南方人中究竟有多少属于白人后裔也不得而知。如果只要有哪怕万分之一的白人血统和万分之9999矮黑人的血统都能称为白人的话就您不去卖酒真是可惜了。
所以我说说印度人是白人的说法是荒谬的,最多一部分人混有白人血统罢了。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 2 层
😠白人多个屁啊,都是没尾巴的猴子 伊通河畔 字64 2013-10-16 09:03:15
🙂印度人的确是白人与土著的混血 2 川普 字419 2013-04-07 23:09:52
🙂印度一百多个民族,泛泛的讲“印度人”恐怕太笼统了 夜月空山 字0 2013-04-10 00:49:04
🙂我不认为我错了,也没有什么好现眼的。
🙂你这才是胡扯 1 川普 字535 2013-04-08 21:23:32
🙂说人胡扯也请举出数据来 圣火 字298 2013-04-09 13:05:08
🙂One drop rule 2 布老虎 字104 2013-04-14 20:28:25
🙂所谓“白人” 16 温雅颂 字421 2013-04-01 19:11:30