主题：从金正男被暗杀的作案手法，替北朝鲜辩护一下 -- 海峰

Pyongyang, February 23 (KCNA) -- A citizen of the DPRK bearing a diplomatic passport suddenly fell into a state of shock before boarding an airliner and died on the way to a hospital in Malaysia on February 13.

At that time the Foreign Ministry of Malaysia and the hospital side informed the DPRK embassy in Kuala Lumpur exercising the right to consular protection of DPRK citizens that they confirmed he died of heart stroke and decided to transfer his body to the embassy and get it cremated.

So the DPRK embassy confirmed his identity and asked the Malaysian side to transfer his body.

However, no sooner had south Korean conservative media published a false report that he was "poisoned to death", citing it as "source from the government" that night, than the Malaysian secret police got involved in the case and recklessly made it an established fact, only to make matters complicated.

The DPRK embassy made it clear that autopsy is not necessary as his death had already been confirmed as the one due to heart stroke and autopsy should never be done as he enjoyed extraterritorial right according to the Vienna Convention as a carrier of diplomatic passport.

Nevertheless, the Malaysian side, in disregard of the DPRK's just demand and international law, made an autopsy of the body without any prior agreement with the DPRK side and its presence. Moreover, the Malaysian side clamored for the second autopsy without publishing the results of the first autopsy.

A spokesman for the Korean Jurists Committee in a statement on Wednesday termed this undisguised encroachment upon the sovereignty of the DPRK, a wanton human rights abuse and an act contrary to human ethics and morality.

The statement said:

What merits more serous attention is the fact that the unjust acts of the Malaysian side are timed to coincide with the anti-DPRK conspiratorial racket launched by the south Korean authorities.

Conservative media of south Korea began spreading wild rumors that the DPRK citizen was "poisoned to death by two women agents of the General Reconnaissance Bureau of north Korea" and it is undoubtedly its "deed" before the results of the autopsy were published.

On February 14, a day after his death, Chongwadae of south Korea kicked up a fuss over it and the south Korean authorities were busy holding a ministerial meeting on February 16, showing an excessive response. Moreover, they openly discussed the issue of THAAD deployment though it has nothing to do with the death of a DPRK citizen.

This proves that the south Korean authorities has long expected the case since it worked out a scenario for it.

It is, indeed, regretful that only Malaysia is denying such fact.

The biggest responsibility for his death rests with the government of Malaysia as the citizen of the DPRK died in its land.

The unfriendly attitude of the Malaysian side found a more striking manifestation in the matter of transferring his body to the DPRK side.

Malaysia is obliged to hand his body to the DPRK side as it made an autopsy and forensic examination of it in an illegal and immoral manner. However, it has not yet handed the body under the absurd pretext that it cannot do so unless the family of the deceased presents a DNA sample in accordance with its law.

This proves that the Malaysian side is going to politicize the transfer of the body in utter disregard of international law and morality and thus attain a sinister purpose.

In the early days when the incident happened Malaysia widely publicized that it arrested suspected persons but now keeps mum about it.

What sounds more alarming is that the suspected persons allegedly stated that the DPRK citizen was poisoned to death when "oil like lotion was put on his head with their hands." That means the woman survived even after having poison on her hand while leaving only the poisoned man dead.

The DPRK has already proposed a joint investigation for properly probing the incident and clarified that it is ready to dispatch a delegation of its jurists.

Its aim is to meet the suspected persons and hear their statements, confirm who ordered them and meet the arrested citizen and survey in detail the scene of the incident and its video footage and thus conclude the investigation into the incident in a fair way.

The DPRK will never allow any attempt to tarnish the image of the dignified power of independence and nuclear weapons state but make a thorough probe into the truth behind the case.

It will watch the future attitude of the Malaysian side.

--------------狗狗翻译+手工调整-----------------------

平壤，2月23日（KCNA） - 持朝鲜外交护照的公民在登机前突然陷入昏迷，并在2月13日去马来西亚医院的途中死亡。

?????马来西亚外交部和医院当时通知朝鲜驻吉隆坡大使馆行使领事权利，保护朝鲜公民，他们确认他死于心脏卒中，并决定将他的尸体转移到大使馆并火化。

?????朝鲜大使馆确认了他的身份，并要求马来西亚方面转移他的身体。

?????然而，南朝鲜保守传媒刚刚发表了一份虚假报告，称他“被毒死了”，当天晚上被称为“政府来源”，而马来西亚秘密警察卷入这起案件，并肆无忌惮地使其成立事实，只是使事情复杂。

?????朝鲜大使馆明确表示，没有必要进行尸体解剖，因为他的死亡已经被确认为心脏卒中的死亡，因此根据“维也纳公约”作为外交护照的载体，他享有域外权利，不应进行尸体解剖。

?????然而，马来西亚方面无视朝鲜的正当要求和国际法，在没有事先征得朝鲜方面同意和在场的情况下，对尸体进行解剖。更过分的是，马来西亚在没有公布第一次尸体检验结果的情况下，又进行了第二次尸体解剖。

?????朝鲜法学家委员会发言人在星期三的一份声明中称，这种对朝鲜主权的不可侵犯的侵犯，肆无忌惮的侵犯人权行为以及违反人道德和道德的行为。

?????声明说：

?????更值得注意的是，马来西亚方面的不公正行为与南朝鲜当局发动的反朝鲜共产主义竞选的时间恰好一致。

?????韩国的保守传媒开始传播谣言说，朝鲜公民“被北韩侦察局的两名女性代理人毒死”，在尸体解剖结果公布之前无疑是“契据”。

?????2月14日，在他去世后的第二天，韩国的Chongwadae大肆抨击，南朝鲜当局在2月16日忙着举行部长级会议，表现出过度的反应。此外，他们公开讨论了THAAD部署的问题，尽管它与朝鲜公民的死亡无关。

?????这证明，南朝鲜当局长期以来一直期望这种情况，因为它制定了一个方案。

?????确实，令人遗憾的是，只有马来西亚否认这一事实。

?????他死亡的最大责任在于马来西亚政府，因为朝鲜公民在其土地上死亡。

?????马来西亚方面的不友好态度在将他的身体转移到朝鲜方面的问题上发现了更加明显的表现。

?????马来西亚有义务将其身体移交朝鲜方面，因为它以非法和不道德的方式进行尸体解剖和法医检查。然而，它还没有以一个荒谬的借口，除非死者家属根据其法律提供一个DNA样本，否则它不能这样做。

?????这证明马来西亚方面将彻底无视国际法和道德政治化身体的转移，从而实现一个邪恶的目的。

?????在早期的事件发生的马来西亚广泛宣传，它逮捕涉嫌人，但现在保持妈妈关于它。

?????更令人震惊的是，据称涉嫌的人说，朝鲜公民在“用手将油类的化妆水放在头上”中毒了死亡。这意味着这个女人甚至在她的手上有毒物后仍然存活，而只留下中毒的男人死了。

?????朝鲜已经提出了一项联合调查，以便适当探测这起事件，并澄清说它准备派遣其法学家代表团。

?????其目的是与嫌疑人会面，听取他们的声明，确认谁下令他们和遇到被捕公民，并详细调查事件现场及其视频片段，从而以公平的方式结束对事件的调查。

?????朝鲜绝不允许任何企图破坏独立和核武器国家尊严的权力的形象，而是彻底调查该案的真相。

?????它将观察马来西亚方面的未来态度。

-------------

看热闹的不怕事情大，支持朝鲜核平马来西亚。