美国窦娥
有的人是真蠢。美国司法是公正的么？如果是，那就别为李文和孟晚舟叫屈！
你从中文网拷贝粘贴了一大堆，为什么不给出英文原文出处呢?
Despite the fact that the NTSB and Parker-Hannifin had already ruled out the possibility of mechanical failure as a cause to the crash of Flight 185 due to a defective PCU servo valve-unit (manufactured by Parker-Hannifin), an independent and private investigation refocused on and further examined the recovered PCU device whose malfunctioning has been pointed out in other sudden Boeing 737 crashes. The manufacturer's records relating to this particular unit revealed that it had failed some routine tests, but they claimed to have corrected these problems. A metals expert, with the use of images from a scanning electron microscope, concluded that the servo valve had 'chip-outs' and numerous burrs "that could easily have interfered with the smooth operation of the valve".[24] After this investigation was complete, in 2004, a Los Angeles Superior Court jury in the United States, which was not allowed to hear or consider the NTSB's conclusions about the accident, found that the crash was caused by a defective servo valve in the plane's rudder.[24] The hydraulic PCU device manufacturer, Parker-Hannifin, was ordered to pay the three families of victims involved in that case US$43.6 million.[23] After threatening to appeal the verdict, Parker-Hannifin later compensated all families involved (although it did not accept liability).[4][25]
原文在此 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/SilkAir_Flight_185
不懂英文的替你翻译, 要点是 ：
1. 美国国家运输安全委员会（NTSB）报告认为“失事原因是有人蓄意操控飞机坠毁，此人极有可能是机长”。NTSB是权威部门。这次东航空难也是NTSB参与。
2. 所谓的华特赖克的调查小组，就是民间律师，跟中国的陈秋实差不多。
3. 陪审团不被允许听取或考虑 NTSB 关于事故的结论。也就是说全凭双方律师谁能忽悠。辛普森案知道吧？事实具在居然脱罪，愣是让律师得逞了。此案也一样。
4. 法庭不使用美国国家运输安全委员会（NTSB）报告作为证据。全凭陪审团判定。美国陪审团是什么人，就是街坊邻居，一个也专业人士也没有。
5. 尾舵制造商Parker Hannifin打输了官司，认倒霉赔钱，但不承认对空难有责任。
Parker Hannifin是方向舵制造商。方向舵不是升降舵，有缺陷只能导致飞机转圈，不会导致俯冲。
Parker Hannifin就是美国窦娥。
