主题:【信息流行病】新冠超额死亡数据的悖论 -- 夕曦
即excess deaths/mortality,跟你的定义不一样:
The COVID-19 pandemic has produced excess deaths, the number of all-cause fatalities exceeding the expected number in any period.
We applied autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) models to US Census populations (2014-2019) and seasonal ARIMA (sARIMA) models to Massachusetts
Department of Health all-cause mortality statistics (from January 5, 2015, through February 8, 2020) to account for prepandemic age and mortality trends and to project the age stratified (0-17, 18-49, 50-64,and≥65 years) weekly population and the weekly number of expected deaths in Massachusetts during the pandemic period
Excess mortality for each period was defined as the difference between the observed deaths and point estimate for sARIMA-determined expected deaths.
超额死亡是实际死亡与预期死亡之差。这里的预期死亡(expected deaths)是基于疫情前的数字,应该不包括疫情直接死亡, 不然就得不出论文的结论:
Others have reported that the Omicron variant may cause milder COVID-19. If true, increased all-cause excess mortality observed during the Omicron wave in Massachusetts may reflect a higher mortality product (ie, a moderately lower infection fatality rate multiplied by far higher infection rate).
the present findings indicate that a highly contagious (although relatively milder) SARS-CoV-2 variant can quickly confer substantial excess mortality, even in a highly vaccinated and increasingly immune population.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
🙂没想到定义还有分歧,说说俺的理解 3 普鲁托 字3041 2022-06-22 14:11:18
🙂我的理解是:与正常年份预期死亡数比较后的增加数 3 两个黄鹂鸣翠柳 字490 2022-06-21 05:16:07
🙂疫情中新冠直接相关死亡各国都有统计 夕曦 字102 2022-06-20 17:43:07
🙂JAMA论文中的超额死亡
🙂感谢你的认真,之前回复时我已经考虑这个问题。 夕曦 字258 2022-06-20 19:56:33
🙂【信息流行病】对新冠超额死亡不同层次认知的悖论 4 夕曦 字4049 2022-06-20 11:11:48
🙂再说一个“眼见为实”层次的认知吧 19 283号出口 字1291 2022-06-20 18:15:45
🙂你说的观点我可以理解。原帖是讨论热点话题 1 夕曦 字222 2022-06-20 18:47:28