主题:关于1979年中印GDP比较有如下结果 -- wolfgan
1952年,中国电力80亿度,到1978年,2700亿度。美国从4700亿到2.3万亿度,日本从530亿到5500亿,印度从60亿度到1000亿,,巴西从90亿度到1000亿度,看到没,战后各国增速都很快。中国那样低的基数,增速与别国没拉开量级差距。。
再看看1978年到2019年,中国增长31倍,美日都不到1倍,印度18倍,巴西6倍。
二战之后,大家的基数都低,增长率都很容易提高,当然会有快有慢,但是没有数量级的区别。
但是,qq老兄提到的MPS与SNA方法有意思,我提供的靶子里面有提到这点 https://www.conference-board.org/pdfdownload.cfm?masterProductID=8492,
那篇论文从第10页开始解释为啥MPS会夸大增长率,并且用数学公式证明了这一论点,可惜,河里无人应战。
至于河里左派津津乐道的电力发展数据,论文的第17页讲实证验证的,也提到了其他人的实证研究成果,其中一些涉及能源,有心深入了解的河友,其实可以看看专业人士是如何验证的。
Empirical evidence
This upward-bias hypothesis has been investigated and tested for the total
economy by various empirical studies using different approaches ranging from
physical output or commodity indicator (Maddison, 1998a and 2007; Maddison and
Wu, 2008), 12 energy consumption (Adams and Chen, 1996; Rawski, 2001), food
consumption (Garnaut and Ma, 1993), to foreign price approximation (Ren, 1997).
Despite different results, all alternative measures appear to be strongly supportive to
the hypothesis. For example, for the period 1978-97, compared with the official GDP
growth rate of 9.8 percent per annum, it is estimated as 4.8 percent by the energy
approach (Adams and Chen, 1996), 6.8 to 8.5 percent by alternative price indices
(Ren, 1997; Wu, 2000), and 7.5 percent by volume movement (Maddison, 1998). For
the period 1978-2005, the annual growth rate is estimated by Maddison and Wu (2008)
at 7.9 percent per annum compared with the official estimated rate of 9.6 percent per
annum
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 2 层
🙂关键是76-78,怎么算,邓掺和了多少,尤其是在经济路线上, 2 真离 字425 2024-01-16 04:35:29
🙂小平不死,大盗不止。 3 叶入林 字0 2024-01-13 22:42:23
🙂这种算法,真是笑掉大牙 绝缘体1 字302 2024-01-12 07:08:48
🙂这个说的对
🙂首先,这是个“假说” 1 假设 字750 2024-01-15 22:03:20
🙂搞错了,伍晓鹰是唯一作者 1 假设 字286 2024-01-17 05:33:50
🙂关于81-11年的中印对比数据 懒厨 字183 2024-01-16 01:00:27
🙂这个“假说”说的是工业增加值被夸大并被平滑处理了 假设 字319 2024-01-16 03:49:22