淘客熙熙

主题:我对进化论的一些看法兼与流云商榷 -- 数字马甲

共:💬40 🌺34
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 科学的讨论我欢迎

你说的对,科学没有绝对。任何科学理论都可以被证伪。所需要的只是一个反例。这是科学的精神。

进化论从存在到今天,接受了不少考验,你同意吧。现在还没有任何反例证明这个理论不正确。进化论还有很多很多解释不了的东西,这很自然。假设如果将来有什么证据证明进化论是不正确的,那它就会被抛弃,或者修改,或有新的理论形成,这毫无疑问。讨论进化论的细节,超出了我的范围。但是我不明白为什么”需要同时有雌的和雄的同时发生变异“?父母的一方产生变异,生出的子女不管是雌雄都会聚乘变异,难道不是吗?告诉我如果我理解错了。

进化论在wikipedia上有简明的解释,以及各种各样无数的证据来证明。其中有如下一段

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

Ever since the publication of The Origin of Species in 1859, evolution has been a source of nearly constant controversy. In general, controversy has centered on the philosophical, social, and religious implications of evolution, not on the science of evolution itself; the proposition that biological evolution occurs through the mechanism of natural selection is completely uncontested within the scientific community.[49]

As Darwin recognized early on, perhaps the most controversial aspect of evolutionary thought is its applicability to human beings. Specifically, many object to the idea that all diversity in life, including human beings, arose through natural processes without a need for supernatural intervention. Although many religions, such as Catholicism, have reconciled their beliefs with evolution through theistic evolution, creationists object to evolution on the basis that it contradicts their theistic origin beliefs.[50] In some countries—notably the United States—these tensions between scientific and religious teachings have fueled the ongoing creation-evolution controversy, with the politics of creationism especially centering on public education.[51][52][53][54] While many other fields of science, such as cosmology[55] and earth science,[56] also conflict with a literal interpretation of many religious texts, evolutionary biology has borne the brunt of these debates. Some also argue that evolutionary common descent "degrades" human beings by placing them on the same level as other animals, in contrast with past views of a great chain of being in which humans are "above" animals.

那有什么证据支持”神创论“呢?如果有有证据证明它不对,那你会抛弃它吗?

神说按照自己的形象创造了人,那么神的形象是6000年前人的形象吗?

所以我不知道为什么Richard Dawkins会得出邻舍只是指犹太人的结论?

你的例子都是新约中的吧。你能找出旧约里面的例子吗?

另外,详细的分析在这里http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/taboos/ltn01.html

不是断章取义的曲解也不是人云亦云的盲从。信仰是思辨的,绝不是盲从。

段章取意?

你可能没有意识到,几乎100%信教的人都在”断章取义“。不同教派的人,甚至一个教派里不同的人,都从圣经里挑选出自己认为是对的,没有人100%相信圣经里的每一句话。圣经里说要杀死不信教的人,要杀死安息日工作的人,要杀死同性恋,要杀死通奸的,奴隶制是合理的,女人是低下的。现在有谁敢说他们也相信这些?

这里有个video,有些过分,但是里面列出一些圣经上说的,但现代道德观普遍不接受的:

http://youtube.com/watch?v=vkXOwBIRX7Y

”断章取义的曲解“?那有没有断章取义的”正“解呢?

信仰是思辨的,绝不是盲从。

事实正好相反,大部分的信仰是盲从。举例来说,若果一个小孩”碰巧“出生在美国,那他/她多半回信基督教。如果他/她出生在阿拉伯世界,那就是伊斯兰教。如果出生在印度,那就是hindu。这些小孩有选择?这不叫盲从?

全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河