主题：【原创】回葡萄，关于中美比较 -- 大众河蟹
家园 Actually I don’t think China was doing the right thing in investing so many resources into the automotive industry. More resources should have been directed to public transportation and aviation.
Secondly, China is not protecting and growing mid-class the way it should.
Mid-class is the No. 1 factor affecting consumption and social stability, which in turn have positive impacts on sustainable economic growth.
In real estate industry, China has been heavily skewed towards the high class market segments and therefore resulted in huge surplus and waste. Yet on the mid- and low- market segments, the needs are under served.
Finally, China is still putting too much censorship on cultural and entertaining products (such as movies, books, etc.), and worst of all, China’s education system sux!
- 复 Actually
家园 赞 中国人口密度高，建立高度发达的公共交通网才是最经济的。
I don’t think China was doing the right thing in investing so many resources into the automotive industry. More resources should have been directed to public transportation and aviation. - 复 Actually
家园 中国的教育差？ 谁的好
- 复 Actually
家园 cultural and entertaining produc 管制好。那破东西没产出。
家园 Wrong Do you know how many products have been, and are being, developed around the book and the movie "The Lord of the Ring"? Do you know how much wealth has been created out of this book and movie? Bear in mind that this money is also much 'cleaner', in the sense that the level of pollution generated to create this wealth is very low, compared to other industries. What's more it can also boost tourism, increasing tourists spendings from both domestic and overseas.
China has such a long and rich history. We can fabricate far more exciting and attractive stories and produce highly successful movies, thereby driving a huge business around those stories and movies.
- 复 Wrong
家园 真累。。写什么E文呀。。。 嚄，从文化输出角度，挣全球的钱，确实也不错。这个恐怕要傍上经济的光环才成。。 等等吧。 有钱了，自然就有人来舔了。 现在，早了点。。
- 复 Wrong
家园 这一次站在猪脚这边……熊掌不要拍我……