淘客熙熙

主题:阿帕奇伊拉克打火鸡 -- 乡下大西瓜

共:💬400 🌺256 🌵21
分页树展主题 · 全看首页 上页
/ 27
下页 末页
    • 家园 我看了这段视频,是美军自己人拍的,发到网上的

      黑白视频,是武装直升机的光学瞄准装置画面。

      显示街头,屏幕中心的十字架压在人群上,烟雾升起,清晰显示几个人被气浪抛开。让后又开火了一两次。救护车来。。。。。。

      其实美军做的屠杀伊拉克平民的事情,很多。比如有陆军几个人渣,去害了一位伊拉克14岁少女全家。

    • 家园 把他们扔去37年的南京

      把他们扔去37年的南京

    • 家园 Gates盖棺定论了

      国防部长Gates先生上ABC的This week接受采访,不可避免也谈到了这段录像。采访连接如下:http://blogs.abcnews.com/politicalpunch/2010/04/gates-on-wikileaks-video-not-helpful-but-should-not-have-lasting-consequences.html

      TAPPER: Secretary Gates, WikiLeaks recently released a video that showed U.S. troops killing some civilians in Iraq. I understand the fog of war, and I understand that -- that this was a very difficult situation. Does the release of that video, and the fact that that happened damage the image of the U.S. in the world?

      GATES: I don't think so. They're -- they're in a combat situation. The video doesn't show the broader picture of the -- of the firing that was going on at American troops. It's obviously a hard thing to see. It's painful to see, especially when you learn after the fact what was going on. But you -- you talked about the fog of war. These people were operating in split second situations.

      And, you know, we -- we've investigated it very thoroughly. And it's -- it's unfortunate. It's clearly not helpful. But by the same token, I think -- think it should not have any lasting consequences.

      既然明说“it should not have any lasting consequences”, 后面的发展就可想而知了。不过真得会如他所说,对美国的形象,特别GLA的形象没长久影响?毕竟人心如镜。

    • 家园 在CCTV上看过这段视频之后觉得有疑问,阿帕奇拍摄

      的未免也太过于清晰了吧?感觉倒像是一架小型无人机一直在遇害记者的头顶跟踪拍摄。

      光看视频怎么都不觉得那是武装直升机在一边作案,一边拍摄。

分页树展主题 · 全看首页 上页
/ 27
下页 末页


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河