主题：【原创】公民洗脑指南 -- 同人于野

她建议中国的说客对美国人要“多讲故事，少讲数字。”

看了后，觉得很有道理。

楼主关于洗脑的分析入木三分，可这最后一段，却说得有点不清不楚。

利益集团有利益集团的自由，普通人有普通人的自由。这两个自由是同一回事吗？不是。

众所周知，在某些情况下，利益集团的利益，反而意味着多数普通人的损失。

‘自由的代价’这句话里的自由二字，按正常理解，当是指‘普通人’的自由。那么，是普通人的自由越大，利益集团的自由就越大吗？还是说，普通人的自由越大，利益集团的自由就越小，从普通人身上谋取利益时就越是绑手绑脚呢？

按正常理解，应当是后者。

前面有人提到，民主是诱奸，专制是强奸，其话中之意，与这‘自由的代价’其实也相差不远。为什么要诱奸？难道利益集团有诱奸癖，非要诱一下再奸才能得到满足？非也。利益集团要的只是利益，他们只想要奸，诱，只不过是想要达到‘奸’这一目的的必要手段而已。

因为普通人也有做出选择的自由，霸王硬上弓的可能性就低了，‘诱’就成了‘奸’的必要手段。‘奸’是利益，但‘诱’乃是成本。普通人的自由，就是利益集团的代价。

这才是自由的代价。

当然了，他们是利益集团，不是慈善集团，他们付出的代价总是要转嫁给别人的。利益集团的利益往往意味着普通人的损失，利益集团的损失却很少意味着普通人的利益。被洗脑的人作出被洗脑的选择，这意味着谁要付出代价？

这应当叫做民主的代价---或者，如果你认为投票不等于民主的话，叫做---‘投票的代价’。

理想中的民主就是让人拥有选择的自由，它也是自由的一种体现。洗脑的最终目的，就是要破坏这种选择，减少这种自由，把你的选择变成利益集团让你选的选择。

普通人的自由，就是利益集团的代价。

利益集团要追求利益，就要降低代价。

要维护自己的利益，维护自己作出选择的自由，每个人都要付出‘思考’这种代价。

这也是自由的代价。

所以---

‘Freedom Is Not Free'

====================================================

V: Good evening, London. Allow me first to apologize for this interruption. I do, like many of you, appreciate the comforts of every day routine- the security of the familiar, the tranquility of repetition. I enjoy them as much as any bloke. But in the spirit of commemoration, thereby those important events of the past usually associated with someone's death or the end of some awful bloody struggle, a celebration of a nice holiday, I thought we could mark this November the 5th, a day that is sadly no longer remembered, by taking some time out of our daily lives to sit down and have a little chat. There are of course those who do not want us to speak. I suspect even now, orders are being shouted into telephones, and men with guns will soon be on their way. Why? Because while the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power. Words offer the means to meaning, and for those who will listen, the enunciation of truth. And the truth is, there is something terribly wrong with this country, isn't there? Cruelty and injustice, intolerance and oppression. And where once you had the freedom to object, to think and speak as you saw fit, you now have censors and systems of surveillance coercing your conformity and soliciting your submission. How did this happen? Who's to blame? Well certainly there are those more responsible than others, and they will be held accountable, but again truth be told, if you're looking for the guilty, you need only look into a mirror. I know why you did it. I know you were afraid. Who wouldn't be? War, terror, disease. There were a myriad of problems which conspired to corrupt your reason and rob you of your common sense. Fear got the best of you, and in your panic you turned to the now high chancellor, Adam Sutler. He promised you order, he promised you peace, and all he demanded in return was your silent, obedient consent. Last night I sought to end that silence. Last night I destroyed the Old Bailey, to remind this country of what it has forgotten. More than four hundred years ago a great citizen wished to embed the fifth of November forever in our memory. His hope was to remind the world that fairness, justice, and freedom are more than words, they are perspectives. So if you've seen nothing, if the crimes of this government remain unknown to you then I would suggest you allow the fifth of November to pass unmarked. But if you see what I see, if you feel as I feel, and if you would seek as I seek, then I ask you to stand beside me one year from tonight, outside the gates of Parliament, and together we shall give them a fifth of November that shall never, ever be forgot.

---V for Vendetta

但还有一部保护公民财产权，人身自由权和言论自由权的宪法，和一个独立的执行宪法的司法部们。 有了这个保障， 民选的总统和立法者再怎么给人民洗脑， 也不会闹到太离谱的境地。 直选或普选都没关系。

有钱人的想法也不是一样的。 各个电视台的观点也有不同。 洗脑出来的观众也分不同派别。 社会不同的利益团体互相牵制， 妥协， 各派得到一些，失去一些。 最怕的是统一的洗脑。

美国政治有一个好处是中央不集权。 地方政府对本地事务有极大权力。 普通人在国家大事上也许会被蒙蔽， 但地方事务就不太容易被蒙了。 因为这个关系他的切身利益。

不能一概而论。不看少看电视也可以减小被洗脑的可能。

http://69.147.90.156/1145/1169822342_5b853fcd05_b.jpg

那些提起布什就一脸愤恨，把他说得一无是处和西特勒一样, 的高学历Left，何尝不是被洗脑？ 抑或他们给自己洗脑，只看，只听自己愿意看和听的。

啥意思呢？

布什是右派吧？希特勒没有高学历吧？

感觉无论是左是右，观点极端，听不进反对派观点，遇到不同意见就把人往对立面推的，智商都高不到哪里去。

国家大事么，大家都是非常清楚地。

并且，国家大事还没有世界大事清楚呢。

至于家门口的事情，就谁也没办法管了，操那个心干什么？

这次看懂了。

我也不喜欢布什，没到一提就恨的程度，但也觉得这个人除了给他的家族揽钱以外基本上一无是处；原来没拿他和希特勒去比，现在仔细琢磨还真有点像。

我也算高学历，但我是右派！

中国人也不傻。

以前住老房子，一帮子叔叔伯伯每天早上在无遮无挡的厕所里谈论世界大事。