主题：【原创】和橡树村兄：也谈实验室火灾 -- 苏迅
那里五十年代是农学院。
桶是小口的，里面有没有着火不知道，表面那层塑料上洒了酒精，起火了
桶口可能有火了吧？就没办法下手了。
直接扑灭比较方便。转移开也是对的。
紧急情况，能去处理就不错了。
记得两次灭火后干粉都呈奇怪的黄绿色，所以有些害怕，现在想想，可能是磷酸铵在酒精溶液中的颜色。
学校没有任何安全培训，每年119纪念日搞点活动，几个教工拿灭火器做作样子而已。不过安全设备的检查还是比较周到的，每年查两次，也会及时更换过期设备。
我使用灭火器的经验也只是平时看书和电视了解的，所以第一次才会慌乱。
至于急救，算了吧，就是学校红十字协会的会员也不一定知道。出事就打电话到120和校保卫处。上次有学生被刀捅了脾脏，救护车刚到就不行了，急救也没用。
能救人命的呀。
不过国内有这种机会么？不清楚。
sorry I cannot type chinese now.
Just want to say that fire cannot be burning inside at that moment. Oxygen trapped in that kind of containers will quickly be consumed if there's fire inside. So if there was fire inside at that moment, only two phenomena you should have observed: an explosion, if the trapped air volume was high and the air-fuel mixture was good, or extinction, if the trapped air volume was low or the air & ethanol gas was not well-mixed.
When there is fire inside a container with a small opening, what you do is to loosely cover the opening - a piece of paper or your palm on the opening will do the job. This way the fire will go off quickly and pressure will not build.
Trying to move the container when still suspecting liquid burning inside was absolutely dangerous. If the container has a large enough air volume and the liquid inside is a better fuel, like gas, it might very well explode and spray the fuel all over the place and the person. This is especially likely to happen when the liquid/air is disturbed by the movement during transportation.
As to my opinion, the whole accident was not serious at all before the guy in your lab took the wrong action. 黄有财 was totally right about that.
小火，某人惊慌之下，拿了一个东西想去压灭火苗。结果顺手拿的是一瓶酒精，压的时候用力过猛，瓶子破裂。大火
威力差点但也不会差太多的。
我指的是全面100%毁坏的条件下。
不过现在的化工设施，安全应该是第一位的吧，也就是说一个炉子炸了也不会炸到旁边的炉子的，炸一小片也不会炸一大片。
有化工实践经验的大牛讲讲吧。
从使用的材料设备，到报警设备，到相应的措施，到应急预案，等等，东西比较多。
不过也要看客户有多少钱了，给国内设计厂子，安全标准方面考虑的还是差一些。
吉林那年不是大烧了一次？
还价廉物美，环保卫生，经济实惠，实为居家旅行，杀人放火,销赃灭迹之必备。。。。。。
改造完成的天花板
还好,现在基本去华海了
XX技院硅工系...