主题：【原创】简单评论评论蒋介石 -- 电子赵括
虽然历史不可以假设，但是如果当时换做另外一个政党，也只能是眼睁睁看着外蒙独立的。比较搞笑的是现在台湾的地图上可以看出还是不肯承认外蒙独立的，倒是49年之后大陆的地图上已经承认外蒙是一个国家了。
我大清若是逃到某个兔子不拉屎的小岛上然后把脸一抹，宣布不承认以前签的所有卖国条约，把地图一口气画到欧洲去，顺便以此指控中华民国或共和国“卖国”，“不如我大清爱国”，那多爽。
武汉政府时期，把国民革命军军官的地主家属拉出去游街、镇压、枪毙，这个也算没造国民党的反？你总不能指望所有人都有李立三的觉悟水平吧。
大革命当中TG的过左，损害了国共同盟，是不容否认的事实。
Britain is far from China and the supply line is by far too long, so they could hardly win if there was any conflict between both sides.
The risk is too high, because Japan is very close to China, and they don't have serious problem with supply line. It is quite possible to trigger a war if Jiang would do like that, while launching a war against Japan by Jiang at that time was apparently politically unwise. It is no good to make too many enemies either domestically or internationally. Jiang just defeated those domestic military lords (partially contributed by Zhang's YiZhi) , and his position was not well recognized. It is quite possible that only Jiang himself struggled to start an open war with whole Japan (Refere to Primer Li HongZhang of Qin in 1894). It is quite likely he couldn't obtain any supports from other domestic military lords, like Yan, Li, Zhang, and Feng. (Refer to how those peasant style generals of 29A did in Beijing in 1937) Moreover, in 1928, not only Jiang's armies, it might be any of Chinese armies was not sufficiently strong to win Japanese armies in an open war. This could be proved by 1/28 event in shangahi, when 19A of Guangdong, and 5A of Jiang had fights with Japanese armies, which turned out the best Chinese army could not resist Janpese army's attack. How comes 9/18? It is simply because silly boy Zhang ShaoShuai had no courage to stop KuandoGun's attack using force. Zhang's army could be one of the best armies armed with best weapons in China.
对反动地主的镇压也是当时国民党遵循的联俄联共扶助农工政策的逻辑必然。
这种事顶多只能解释成忠孝不能两全的不幸罢了，要解释成共产党伤害了国民党的感情，太牵强了吧？
当然你要说这种运动中被牵连进的某些国民党党员，团结到以蒋介石为核心的代表地主阶级利益国民党右派中，为了家族利益，背叛国民党最初的革命理想，这个是事实。
The components are really complicated, because it also included those local armies like 7A, or 35A. However those leaded by Jiang could be called 国民党的党军, because the skeleton forces were composed of those students from HuangPu.
If one considered the ratio of soliders and officers whose parants of relatives were killed by peasant associations, those GMD gernerals absolutely won't tolerate it. So you won't say "背叛国民党最初的革命理想".
There are many ways to improve the system. Violence might be the last one would consider.
蒋在北伐战争时期就是国民党最高领袖么？如果不是那么效命于蒋私人的军队怎么能说是国民党党军？
蒋的班底是黄埔没错，别忘了黄埔也是共产党高级将领的摇篮。黄埔的政治部主任还是周恩来呢。如果真的说黄埔就是党军的标志，那从人事安排我看是两党的党军，如果硬要说一党的，也是象土共的比象国民党的多。
需要注意的是，北伐时期农民运动针对的是封建地主，从来没听说过针对国民党。国民党本身当时的纲领也是反对封建地主的。至于为什么不得不诉诸暴力，请参考湖南农民运动考察报告。按当时的赤贫农民比例，我倒觉得不暴力反抗简直是没有天理了。
当时共产党员以个人名义加入国民党，成了双料党员，然后又在国民党的各级组织中发展共产党组织。虽然这个可能不叫造反，但是我估计即使是共产党也是决不会允许这种事在自己身上发生的。
《孙文-越飞宣言》就明确宣布了苏俄的那套从肉体上消灭剥削阶级的东西，在中国不适用，也不会使用。三民主义的主张是渐进和赎买。TG是在这个宣言的基础上加入国民党的战线的。
后来TG的过激工农政策，显然是违背了当初加入国民党时对“友党”的承诺。
1923越飞宣言相关的表述是
（一）孙逸仙博士以为共产党主义组织甚至苏维埃制度，事实上均不能引用于中国，因中国并无可使此项共产主义或苏维埃制度实施成功之情形存在之故。此项见解，越飞君完全同感，且以为中国最重要最迫切之问题，乃在民国的统一之成功，与完全国家的独立之获得。关于此项大事业，越飞君并向孙博士保证，中国当得到俄国国民最挚热之同情，且可以俄国援助为依赖。
1924一次全代确定联俄联共扶助农工后相关的表述是
可以看出，从1923年到1924年，孙文代表的国民党在于中国共产党协商合作的过程中显然达成了妥协，不仅否认了之前提出的
是通过发行国债赎买和税收来慢慢调节。而不是通过暴力斗争、无条件没收和肉体毁灭来实现的。这个纲领在国民党来说是一贯的。