主题:广东韶关斗殴一审判决了 -- 小乌龙
Agreed from a legal perspective it's alright. But it is a political decision when to engage law.
Over the past thirty years, law was rarely engaged against criminals from certain minorities over the crimes they committed towards Han people. Law was always engaged, and over engaged, over Han criminals under the same circumstances. Anyone?
7/5 and 7/6 of 2009 in Urumqi. It is no longer isolated criminal acts. That thousands of men, women and children slain in the street simply because their ethnic appearance, perpetuated by men, women and children of another ethnic group, is ethnic cleansing and crime against humanity.
Where was law on 7/5 and 7/6 in the street of Urumqi?
I wouldn't have a problem if law were enforced throughout. In fact, that's my ideal.
Today's America is a law ruling society. Because of that ethnic cleansing doesn't happen inside its owner border. When it does happen due to external forces on 9/11, America declared war. America declared 9/11 perpetuators and their accomplices enemy combatants, not criminals protected by American legal system.
It is not law, stupid. It is the ruling class.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 2 层
🙂我是学法律的,而且目前也从事法律工作 对马 字0 2009-10-13 04:10:31
🙂知道,2000年前后,在老JC上对你就一直很敬仰 flyingcatgm 字0 2009-10-14 08:19:44
🙂老JC藏龙卧虎 对马 字16 2009-10-15 06:25:02
🙂Got to Know the Scope of Law
🙂这名犯罪嫌疑人不过是协助他人防卫过当 2 明日黄花 字96 2009-10-12 20:20:25
🙂这个离防卫也差太远了吧 胖鱼 字216 2009-10-12 21:51:56
🙂对没有参与斗殴的公民进行殴打致伤致死叫做防卫过当? 对马 字4 2009-10-12 21:43:06
🙂请问对马兄?如果你是辩护律师,你会如何陈词? 2 明日黄花 字528 2009-10-13 08:33:29