主题:【原创】关于转基因食品的2点意见 -- nimoheshu
绝对的安全是不存在的,转基因食品风险性不高于“常规食品”,其安全性就是可以接受的。能理解否?
世卫食品安全部门在2005年6月1日就转基因问题发布了一个长达79页的报告,题为《现代食品生物技术,人类健康与发展——以证据为基础的研究》,其中第24页明确写道:“目前国际市场上的转基因食品都经过了风险评估,它们并不比传统的同类食品有更多的风险。”
世界卫生组织网站:
http://www.who.int/foodsafety/biotech/who_study/en/index.html
原文:
3.6 Conclusions
GM foods currently available on the international market have undergone risk assessments and are not likely to present risks for human health any more than their conventional counterparts.
The risk-assessment guidelines specified by CAC are thought to be adequate for the safety assessment
of GM foods currently on the international market. Guidelines for environmental risk assessment have
been developed under the Convention on Biological Diversity.
The potential risks associated with GMOs and GM foods should be assessed on a case-by-case basis, taking into account the characteristics of the GMO or the GM food and possible differences of the receiving environments.
In the field of potential risks derived from outcrossing or contamination from GM crops, relevant consequences need to be investigated for specific crops, and strategies for risk management need to be explored.
As highlighted in the Codex Principles for the risk analysis of foods derived from modern biotechnology (CAC 2003b), the assessment of the potential of GM foods to elicit hypersensitivity reactions should be part of the risk assessment for GM foods. This includes a general analysis of the proteins expressed and assessment of the specific properties of the GM food under consideration to
elicit hypersensitivity reactions. A better understanding of the impact and interaction of food with the immune system is required to decipher how and whether conventional and GM foods cause specific health and safety problems.
New methodology for the development of GMOs may significantly reduce potential risks derived from the random integration of transgenes used in current methods.
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 9 层
🙂世界卫生组织,联合国粮农组织,FDA,欧盟..... 1 journal 字8352 2014-01-20 20:19:32
🙂另外,世界卫生组织一直强调长期监测 1 qq97 字543 2014-01-21 01:20:37
🙂我问的是科学家,你说的是组织 qq97 字921 2014-01-21 01:14:18
🙂这些组织得出的结论难道不是由科学家研究评估出来的么?
🙂不要瞎子摸象,难道你没有发现QQ引用的也是WHO的? 思想的行者 字129 2014-01-21 03:13:27
🙂其实挺转的总说反转的双重标准 北纬42度 字48 2014-01-21 12:06:26
🙂这时想起这两个组织了? 4 北纬42度 字922 2014-01-20 20:53:12
🙂不止那两个组织,我想起了很多组织(搜到的) :) 2 journal 字843 2014-01-20 21:20:25