淘客熙熙

主题:芝加哥屈打成招含冤入狱23年的犯人今天获赔537万 -- 领班军机

共:💬28 🌺87 🌵3
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖
家园 难道西方法学的精神是独立于社会之外的么?

存在的就是合理的.

在资本主义的社会制度下,有没有钱就基本决定了一切.

实际上,什么是重罪,什么是小案子,是很难划分的.

偷鸡摸狗,吸毒贩毒的太多了.而且,很多州都有三振出局法.

看看这个可怜的哥们,为了不到$230,被判了可提前假释的终身监禁.

Defendant William James Rummel had, prior to the offense in question, twice pled guilty to felony charges involving property:

In 1964, Rummel pled guilty to fraudulent use of a credit card to obtain $80 worth of goods or services. As the amount in question exceeded $50, under Texas law the offense was classified as a felony punishable by 2–10 years in the Texas Department of Corrections (TDC). Rummel was sentenced to three years.

In 1969, Rummel pled guilty to passing a forged check in the amount of $28.36. The offense was classified as a felony by 2–5 years in the TDC. Rummel was sentenced to four years.

The third offense, in 1973, involved Rummel refusing to return $120.75 received as payment for repairs of an air conditioning unit that, depending on the source cited, were either performed unsatisfactorily or not at all. By itself, the crime was designated as "felony theft" and punishable by 2–10 years in the TDC. However, the prosecution sought to enhance the sentence under Texas' three strikes law, citing the 1964 and 1969 convictions as proof of Rummel being a repeat offender; the law required a mandatory sentence of life with the possibility of parole if the enhancement allegation were found to be true.

A jury found Rummel guilty of felony theft and also found as true the allegation that Rummel had been convicted of two prior felonies; the trial court imposed the mandatory sentence in accordance with the law.

要不是佛罗里达的穷老黑们因为各种小案子(比如说持有大麻几十克)高比例的入狱,小布什根本就当不上总统.

通宝推:发了胖的罗密欧,shinji,
全看分页树展 · 主题 跟帖


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河