主题:和平与战争 -- 唵啊吽
I generally like authors with some kind of physics, science, or engineering background when they write about "social science" of TGchina, Uncle Sam
the following information is all public, I don't have any private contacts with them, not really even commenting each others post much. I just read their posts.
again, this is not personal, and I would think that they don't really care either.
1.
汉密尔顿ABC, he articulated about US fed model very well, I don't have the link, but posted about him a few times.
2.
陈王奋起挥黄钺, he said he had a physics major, works in semi conductor industry. He posts extensively, and I don't care whom he writes for (if,(:)), but he articulated well about TG's "china model";
3.
hullo, he said he knows Chinese farmers well, and he articulates white's 民粹主义 very well, kind of where EU is trapped now.
汉密尔顿ABC has not posted much, I hope he comes back;
陈王奋起挥黄钺 posts extensively, I only read his posts on important subjects of "政治局" level (:).
I disagree with him on many USA related subjects.
hullo posts extensively too, I read his posts on Chinese farmers, 民粹主义, but I am not really a fan of his Chinese culture and 哲学, Chinese "national pride/ego" stuff.
overall, those 3 authors described Tgchina fairly well, and I largely agree with them.
and if I may comment further, for 陈王奋起挥黄钺, hullo, there are some risk of being contained inside 爱因斯坦电梯 made by TG for the current Chinese generations.
but, if 愿打愿挨, then who cares(:)?
and although I think that I have been fairly "objective", myself may well be contained inside 爱因斯坦电梯 made by "white", we all in some kind of 爱因斯坦电梯, one way or another. the trick is to jump from one to another, and never stay inside one 爱因斯坦电梯 for too long, to avoid 被脑残.
and in a way, I do think most of whites never really understand TG's "china model".
luckily for them, they may never really need to, for most of them.
TG's "china model", however powerful it may be, is a local one, working the best in china, and china only.
still, with TG "china model" 爱因斯坦电梯 perspective and experiences, it would help anyone to understand the "social science" of white better, a lot of better.
4.
now, I hope more people like you (science working background, in US/west) come here and talk about "social science" of TGchina, Uncle Sam.
we use to have a quite few, now they are all gone, 被土八路打跑了(:), 土八路 offers some good view points too, not that terrible(:).
now, as Chinese, for whatever reason, we care about tgchina's "china model", which carries a higher risk of 被脑残, this "china model" is highly complicated for whatever reasons.
and I would advise that anybody, unless you really have to, you should generally stay away from reading about it, out of any media, Chinese or foreign. Tons of 脑残热辐射 BS (:).
as said before, there may be a reason for American public's craziness for sports, to avoid 脑残热辐射 BS social sciences coming from everywhere.
and in a way it makes sense, unless you are in this business, why should you care about tg's "china model"?
Chinese gene in the brain(:)?
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 5 层
🙂学习了,多谢! 集庆彪 字38 2014-09-15 00:28:00
🙂I have been waiting 4 比较 2 晓兵 字890 2014-09-15 01:51:19
🙂您是在 集庆彪 字370 2014-09-15 02:03:01
🙂推荐: 汉密尔顿ABC,陈王奋起挥黄钺, hullo
🙂推荐: witten1, changshou 晓兵 字280 2014-09-15 17:47:29
🙂"印度尼西亚政治金融权贵" 晓兵 字6407 2014-09-15 13:55:04
🙂人民币汇率 not 虚高 at all 晓兵 字4832 2014-09-15 07:58:23
🙂我基本同意 集庆彪 字313 2014-09-15 18:50:02