主题：冷眼看占中 -- 种植园土

“This is the first analysis that finds that Section One of the Thirteenth Amendment is not the aberration that most have claimed;”--本论文是第一个否认13修正案第一款是大多数学者声称的偏离（即state action doctrine之例外）的分析。

"Part I of this Article describes the consensus view that the Thirteenth Amendment is an exception to the generally accepted maxim that the U.S. Constitution applies solely to governmental actors. Examining constitutional context and using the techniques of intratextualism"

本文第一部分描述所谓13修正案是state action doctrine之例外的共识观点......

迟至2013年，才有第一个学者挑战这个共识，难道不是本身在承认存在这么一个共识吗？