主题：一个假设案例和孟女士案例的比较和简要法律分析 -- 瀚海黄沙

看看美国的PROVISIONAL ARREST REQUEST FOR WANZHOU MENG《孟晚舟临时逮捕请求书》

Because Meng and other Huawei representatives misrepresented to Financial Institution I (Note:i.e. HSBC) and other financial institutions about Huawei‘s relationship (Note:not specified but maybe China big 4 banks?) about Huawei’s relationship with Skycom, these victim banking (Note:potential victims) institutions were induced into carrying out transactions that they otherwise woud not have completed. (Note: these banks are supposed to rely only on their own decision to provide service or not based on their DD.) As a result, they violates the banks's internal policies, potentially violates U.S. sanctions laws and exposed the banks to the risk of fines and forfeiture. In particular, these relationships included the clearing of hundreds of millions of U.S.-dollar transactions throguh correspondent accounts at financial institutions in Eurozone countries. In essence, these misrepresentations exposed the financial institutions to serious harm and denied the institutions the opportunity to make decisions based on the true risk of processing certain transaction and the reputations rik associated with banking high-risk clients such as Huawei!

这是指控的最核心部分，太水了。因为孟的陈述导致不知是哪里的银行，被我美国司法部处罚的潜在风险敞口，增大了；而且还让这些银行以及还有欧洲的银行向华为提供了跨国结算服务——孟你犯了严重的金融欺诈罪行！