主题：从腾讯的波兰总统专机到李承鹏的朝鲜队员回去挖煤看中国JY -- 陈笑东
家园 从腾讯的波兰总统专机到李承鹏的朝鲜队员回去挖煤看中国JY 中国JY是如何诞生的？除了有些是屁股问题外，很多就是被洗脑洗成250了。而这些JY们照例会严重抗议自己是被洗脑洗成JY了，他们会说自己从来都没接受过中情局或FBI的培训。
说到这里不得不先批评哈ZXB，一个TG的先锋组织在今天完全堕落成一个尸位素餐的摆设。
回头再说JY们被洗脑的过程，他们说没去美国接受培训，可在这个信息传播爆炸式增长，传播毫无国界障碍，来源很难辨别的时代不知不觉中被山姆洗脑那是很简单的事情。一方面是山姆和倭寇用网军这样的专业组织进行系统的造谣，一方面是国内X方系JY等倾尽全力的大力配合传谣，当然还有我们的中宣部的渎职，简直是一条完美无缺的洗脑生产线。
不信吗？波兰总统坠机事件腾讯能火速炮制个唯一专机的谣言出来；朝鲜队顽强拼搏赢得世人尊重的情况下，李承鹏能火速用朝鲜队员输了回去挖煤的谣言出来打压国人对朝鲜队员的支持。X方系不但主动配合山姆倭寇的传谣并且走上前台开始主动造谣了。而这些人的谣言被揭穿后，更是用我有任意发言的权力，但我誓死捍卫不让你坑声的方式来解读什么是他们要带给中国人的民主和自由，真是绝妙的诠释。错肯定不认，更是肆意压制网友的揭露和批驳，真得幸运不是这些石油派执政。李大眼更好玩，他那篇声讨对朝鲜队员顽强作风支持的球迷的文章所有的根基都是建立在朝鲜队员输了会回去挖煤。而这个依据何处，他大眼一盯，大嘴一张，一百个度都知道会去挖煤！
李大眼此人我相信不是如长平徐友渔焦国标那样的处心积虑要让中国享受他们给中国的民主自由路线的人，此人可说智商也很高，可就是这样一个人在铺天盖地的谣言前也是不自觉得被洗成一个白痴，普通人更可想而知了。
你天天看好莱坞和FOX的大片抑或电视可能还只是少少的被洗成美国都是好的，它们的国旗是那么美丽，它们的英雄是那么勇敢。CNN和BBC们又告诉你中国的问题无处不在，当然也的确有很多问题，不过问题的根源和解决方式绝对不是他们告诉我们的！再加上网络上无所不在的网特天天告诉你中国的一切问题都在体制！解决所有问题的手段就是一个---改变体制！！只要一改体制我们就和美国一样强大和美国人一样生活了。好了，一个JY诞生了！！
至于为什么全世界200多个国家和地区除了23十个国家和地区很富裕，没人告诉你；为什么体制早和美国接轨了几百年的墨西哥、哥伦比亚处处人间地狱没人告诉你；为什么人口、近代史和中国类似的印度以民主自由体制搞了和中国TG建设相同的时间却全面大幅度落后于中国没人告诉你；为什么民主自由了的俄罗斯平均寿命反而比苏联时期大幅度倒退没人告诉你；为什么JY们一天鼓吹让人去朝鲜体验生活而自己却不去自由民主的蒙古阿富汗定居，还是没人告诉你！
你们被告诉就是一个----体制！所有问题都是体制问题！！
谁信他们的，恭喜你智商高达250了，你荣升为一个JY了。搞乱中国就看你们的了。
=================
关于专机谣言的考证http://www.wyzxsx.com/Article/Class20/201004/143892.html
关于挖煤谣言的考证
http://view.ccthere.com/article/2969617
通宝推：老沛,坚持的阿甘,Ruadong,njyd,故园湾里,家园 英德之战后我手贱看了郝海东的评论 这孙子是不是也要走李大眼的路子？不过郝海东应该比李大眼有钱啊，不至于这样出位吧。
家园 说实话，铺天盖地的强势洗脑，想不NC很难。 一个人虽然聪明但还是很容易被媒体潜移默化的。
不过李大眼这个人很墙头草。
关于朝鲜队的评论被抨击后，我注意到他的评论有些改变。
一个评论为自己攻击朝鲜辩解，只是恨铁（中国队）不成钢；
一个评论说不要在足球里来发现人生观，这个完全就是在否定自己嘛。最喜欢变看球边启发沉默大多数的人生观的恰恰是这个家伙自己。
这家伙应该是点的透的，很多时候的确是哗众取宠。
家园 李承鹏这人真不怎么样 除了用不知道怎么来的消息到处骂人之外就剩下虚张声势和色厉内荏，如果说那消息还有可能是真的话，最近他的表现只能用惨不忍睹来形容了
家园 好文。俺补充一个美国有良心博客对伊朗绿色革命标志人物 人物，NADA的报道是如何被欧美主要媒体操纵的揭露。很多人都不知道伊朗有两个NADA吧？请看报道。抱歉的很，暂时没时间翻译，只能让大家看原文了。
AGENDA-DRIVEN JOURNALISM AND THE LUST FOR “REGIME CHANGE” IN IRAN
http://www.raceforiran.com/agenda-driven-journalism-and-the-lust-for-%E2%80%9Cregime-change%E2%80%9D-in-iran
A woman named Neda did indeed die last summer on the streets of Tehran, gunned down by members of an Iranian militia. Her full name was Neda Agha-Soltan. But mixed in with the tragic footage of that Neda’s death, broadcast around the world in a viral video that galvanized world opinion against the Iranian regime, was a compelling Facebook snapshot of a smiling young beauty in a flowered headscarf.
Her name was Neda, too—Neda Soltani…
Until last year, Neda Soltani was a teaching assistant for English literature at Tehran’s Islamic Azad University, where she was doing graduate work on feminine symbolism in the work of Joseph Conrad. She wasn’t a supporter of the regime, but she also didn’t belong to any sort of active opposition group, even in the heady days after the disputed election. She was focused on her academic career above all else; while Iranians were marching in the streets, she was correcting her thesis. She led the prosaic life of Tehran’s silent apolitical majority. “I worked for 10 long years to get my position at the university,” she told Germany’s Sueddeutsche Zeitung in February. “I was earning my own money, I had friends, I would go out and I had fun.”
All that changed on June 20 of last year, when a choppy video appeared on YouTube depicting the gruesome and chaotic death of a young Iranian woman…The process began innocuously enough, resting on a foundation of journalism’s most basic building block: competition for a scoop. Working only with the first name heard on the YouTube video, international news organizations raced one another to unearth more information on the young women who died on camera. Forgoing fact checks, editors in New York and London allowed small details to get lost in translation as they communicated with their reporters on the ground: “Agha-Soltan” lost its hyphen, “Agha” was dropped entirely, or “Soltan” picked up an “i”…
。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。。
Neda didn’t begrudge the initial error. There was some resemblance between her and the slain protester, after all. Neda thought the mistake was liable to correct itself eventually, but decided to speed the process along by reaching out to Voice of America, the U.S.-backed satellite network that was among the most strident in using her photo to agitate the Iranian public. In an email, she explained that there had been a mix-up; they had been using a false photo, and she included other photos of herself as evidence.
What followed was a disheartening education in applied media ethics. Instead of issuing a correction, VOA promoted the very photos Neda had used to absolve herself as “exclusive” images of the slain protester. The momentum of the story overwhelmed attempted interventions of the truth. Neda tried repeatedly to sway different networks and news agencies, but for all intents and purposes, she had lost control over her face. On Internet forums, her requests that her photo be removed were met with the accusation that she was a stooge for the regime. “You won’t take our angel away from us, you bastard,” one Internet commenter writes in reply to her plea. On June 23, 2009, the parents of Neda Agha-Soltan released for public use a photo of their daughter—the one who, in fact, had been killed—but it had trouble competing with the existing, if false, image of Neda for primacy as the face of Iran’s freedom movement…”
。。。。。。。。。
家园 一个国家或者民族的落后首先是这个国家或者民族的精英的落后 而精英落后的标志是这些精英不断指责本国或者本民族人民落后。
家园 对！自信！自尊！自强！才是一个民族一个国家永远屹立的根本
家园 李大眼很WS 看过他07还是08年上《实话实话》奥运会礼仪服饰的节目，我就对他没有一丝好感。此人对问题的评点不是来自他有所思考有所探求，而是简单的情绪表达，非常地自以为是。听他的言论不会有收获，还得时时防着他把谣言当事实来传播，很是累了听众观众。
论尖酸刻薄，这种所谓的小知识分子比街坊嚼舌碎嘴婆子还要高出一数量级。可是，我们看电视看评论，不是要再看一次街头骂街吧。
男人刻薄一点很正常，一尖酸就WS了。
家园 这个这个，一定要顶 CNN和BBC们又告诉你中国的问题无处不在，当然也的确有很多问题，不过问题的根源和解决方式绝对不是他们告诉我们的！敞亮！
家园 李大眼怕是没那么纯洁了 去年，差不多也是这个时候河里讨论过他一次。忘了是那回河里河友贴的还是我看他博客看的了，这厮结交了一帮狐朋狗友，然后，“在他们影响下，我开始了一个写球评的向一个公共知识分子的转变”（大意，原话记不清了）。
我以前爱看他的球评，还收着他的博客。但是从09年开始他写的东西就没法看了，什么社会热点都要出来义愤填膺的喊几嗓子，可惜错误百出惨不忍睹。想来也不奇怪，这种中文系出身耍笔杆子的大都感情用事，一缺逻辑思维二少常识储备，如果自己不注意学习又无自知之明的话，很容易归化普世。
当然，也还有另一种可能，就是李大记者根本就是为了换个方式博眼球，一如韩寒同学，今年年初批刘谦露了商演的馅。后来又忙不迭的删文，可惜晚鸟。
