淘客熙熙

主题:【衲记包子】超心理学家驳斥反伪斗士魔术师兰迪 -- 衲子

共:💬25 🌺7 🌵1
分页树展主题 · 全看首页 上页
/ 2
下页 末页
    • 家园 纳子你怎么了

      你有点太执着了吧?兰迪你也反对?

      • 家园 我就爱为underdog声辩,何况这伪科学有发Nature的paper

        Puthoff, Harold and Russell Targ. "Information transmission under conditions of sensory shielding" Nature, 1974, 252, 602-607.

        魔术师兰迪又不是神圣的偶像,为什么不能反? 他既然可以反"伪科学", 咱们也可以反"反伪科学", 这叫否定之否定.

        什么是执着? 我每天都要吃饭, 这算不算执着? 爱迪生试验灯丝的材料, 屡败屡战, 算不算执着?

        • 家园 Nature Vol. 298 p414 29 July 1982

          Correspondence

          No "remote viewing"

          A long drawn out controversy in Nature has followed the claim made by Puthoff and Targ(1) in 1974 that certain individuals can perceive objects or scenes blocked from ordinary perception by distance or shielding (the supposed phenomenon called “clairvoyance” by earlier generations). The most recent communications (2,3) raise issues about the content of Puthoff’s and Targ’s experimental records that can only be settled by direct examination of those records. However, their critic, Marks, has reported their refusal to grant him access to their records (2).

          In an attempt to clarify this issue, writing as a bona fide investigator of long standing in this general area but having no prior involvement with these particular experiments, I recently requested access to the data on the Prince and Hammid series on which Puthoff and Targ based their original case for “remote viewing”. No reply has been received after an interval of two months, despite repeated approaches. It must be concluded that the evidence offered by Puthoff and Targ is not accessible to other investigators. In this sense their claim can no longer be regarded as falling within the scientific domain, and further public discussion appears unnecessary.

          Christopher Scott

          London N19, UK

          1. Targ, R. & Puthoff, H. Nature 251, 602-607 (1974).

          2. Marks, D. Nature 292, 177 (1981).

          3. Puthoff, H. & Targ, R. Nature 292, 388 (1981).

          • 家园 有不平常的(超自然的)理论,必须得有不平常的举证

            即使在科技杂志上发了文章,也必须有可重复的验证。正是,可以欺人一时,不能欺人一世。

            主流科学界所不接受的,并不是一概否定。三十年后的今天,如果“遥视”成立,诺贝尔奖非其莫属。又怎么只是在一个小圈子里自我陶醉。

            还不爱搭理兰迪,有钱也不拿。高!

          • 家园 还有不少reference

            大家可以去nature看看

    • 家园 甭管美眉说了什么, 花~!
分页树展主题 · 全看首页 上页
/ 2
下页 末页


有趣有益,互惠互利;开阔视野,博采众长。
虚拟的网络,真实的人。天南地北客,相逢皆朋友

Copyright © cchere 西西河