主题：投票【注意】视野里政治、时事、社会问题等相关话题的去向征求看法 -- 铁手

If you have only the ‘right’ people (rational and respectful to others) participating in political discussions, ‘wrong’ or ‘bad’ topics are not gonna create any issues, ‘cause you can always persuade people to modify or even erase those ‘bad’ content. The only reason they act as per your request/instruction is simply they are the ‘RIGHT’ people! The ‘wrong’ people have been effectively kept away from the political discussion within cchere.

By the same token, with the ‘right’ people, issues like 不犯忌的主贴下面有犯忌的跟贴 can be easily resolved and will not hurt the board.

Therefore I don’t see any need to make a list of all forbidden topics. The key is to select only the ‘right’ people and screen out the ‘wrong’ people. People who get screened out can go to talkcc.org to speak whatever they like in whatever manner they feel comfortable. Political boards within cchere are kept only for rational and clean discussions, and there’s just no room for personal attacks, acrimonious words, overly emotional and grossed expressions, and stuffs like that.

• 我的建议

“理性探讨的部分，也就是不涉及是非论断的一部分，保留在西西河，但是严格管理” is a very top-level introduction, and it doesn’t tell much about exactly how 严格管理 is to be executed. But I believe there is a way to technically make 严格管理 come true. For example, two discussion boards can be set up within cchere (not talkcc) that are open for political and ideological topics, but only those selected IDs can participate in the discussion.

To be more specific, if you want to participate in the discussion in these two boards, you would have to go through another registration process and wait for a special approval from the high above (Lao Tie and the crew). The criterion Lao Tie’s crew uses to select IDs can be each ID’s previous performance in talkcc.org. If an ID consistently behaves rationally and respects others in talkcc.org then it’ll be approved and allowed to participate in those two boards, while an ID who always behaves overly emotionally and attacks others will be kept away from those two boards.

This way the two boards would only contain articles and discussions that are rational and relatively high-quality in terms of thought-provoking and views-exchanging.

Does this make any sense to you?

主要是考虑两边各自相对独立以后，可以各自专注一些。至少西西河不会受到某些因素的影响。

擦边球的确很难判断，尤其是在目前的状况下。分开后，只要是“可能”，这里就删，反正那边有空间又不限制。

负担方面，我想会轻很多。有些矛盾就比较容易调和。

7、会是一个缓和过渡。