主题：【原创】请教一下中印关系/中印边界问题,急!!! -- zeir

一个印度同学说了这么一句话:

Aggression of China into Indian territories

我感到莫名其妙.那位给指点一下历史概况?

另外,他还说 Sino Tibetan relations--------这句话有没有问题啊

多谢了

补充，这是他的话：

US as a super power has interests in maintaining its' world wide leadership role. India has various issues on which it has to engage the trans national interests and foreign nations. Poverty allievation, Indo Pak relations, Occupation of part of Kashmir by Pakistan, Tibetan refugees, Sino Tibetan relations, Indo China relationship, Aggression of China into Indian territories, Terrorism in Srilanka, Peace and Progress in Nepal are some of the issues. Terms of trade, trade liberlisation, US attitude to BPO, work permits, environment are some of the economic issues. I can not complete this and other lists, because as a large country India has many issues to attend to.

http://view.cchere.com/article/395370

以下为引用上贴中文字：

“62年的中印战争，如今倒是这段历史中最为人所熟知的了。相关的资料都不难查到，所以就只简单的说一下：中印边界自卫反击作战自1962年10月20日开始，至11月21日基本结束，10月20日至28日为第一阶段，主要是击溃了印第七旅，俘其旅长，攻克了克节朗-达旺地区，其间比较重要的事态还有，10 月22日以国防部名义正式宣告我军“没有必要受非法的‘麦线’约束”；第二阶段主要是从11月16日到21日，我军从西到东，全线大捷，特别是在东段，当面印军主力基本全部被击溃，我军前锋直逼中国所主张的“习惯线””

上文是否显示：我军在那次冲突中冲过了边界争议地区，直捣印方本土呢（虽然时间很短）？ 虚心向河友们请教

文字说“直逼中国主张的‘习惯线’”，“直逼”，就是没到，连习惯线都没到，又怎么会直捣印度本土呢。

那个印度同学说我们“Aggression of China into Indian territories”，是按照他们国内的宣传口径，把麦克马洪线作为两国边界，我军打过了麦线，他们自然就认为我们打进他们的领土了。

“Sino Tibetan relations”要驳斥，西藏是中国的一部分，西藏问题是中国内政，不容别人干涉。

我记得有一次聊天时,有一位眉飞色舞(中国人)说,那一次都快打到他们首都了,把他们吓坏了------我只有一个模糊印象

如果一鼓做气，真难说

烦透了！！！！晚上我还要考试呢

刚才找印度人谈了。他说1962年战争 1。 中国人先开战的 2。打到了他们的领土。

是否中国人先开战，再次求教于大家

是否打到了他们的领土？ 我说，那是有争议的领土。他说，他认为就是他们的领土，是中国人认为有争议

关于西藏问题。他说，他说sino-tibet, 只是表明西藏是一个问题-----但是他接着说，他就是认为西藏不应属于中国。这个用法有无问题，求教于大家

我说，你们政府的联合声明是承认的。他说，那些人是政客。 我说，难道你否认你们政府文件的法律效力吗？ 他说，恶法不必遵守--他还扯到法理了。

他的态度很礼貌，但是很坚决。还跟我说了一大堆观点不同不妨碍做朋友之类的话。

我说我不认为这是学术自由问题，这是事实问题。他说，我们对事实有不同的看法，欢迎争论。这是我的表达自由。

我去找教授----就是那个特精的，她说，那你们就争论嘛

树欲静而风不止。我虽然不是学这个专业的，也不想陷入争战，但是好像躲是躲不开的。今晚上我还有一个考试呢！！！除了这门课其他课与政治无关。可是我觉得我不能保持沉默。

但是我时间学识均有限，希望得到大家的意见和帮助：

1。这种情况下需要理它吗？

2。如何反驳他

现有材料如下：

中华人民共和国和印度共和国关系原则和全面合作的宣言

关于西藏问题

The Indian side recognizes that the Tibet Autonomous Region is part of the territory of the People's Republic of China and reiterates that it does not allow Tibetans to engage in anti-China political activities in India. The Chinese side expresses its appreciation for the Indian position and reiterates that it is firmly opposed to any attempt and action aimed at splitting China and bringing about "independence of Tibet".

关于领土纠纷

The two sides exchanged views on the China-India boundary question and expounded their respective positions. They reiterated their readiness to seek a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable solution through consultations on an equal footing. The two sides agreed that pending an ultimate solution, they should work together to maintain peace and tranquility in the border areas, and reiterated their commitment to continue implementation of the agreements signed for this purpose, including the clarification of the line of actual control.

http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/wjdt/2649/t22852.htm

http://news.xinhuanet.com/newscenter/2003-06/24/content_935350.htm

我现在要去准备考试了。专业课考砸了灭自己的志气。请大家大力支持， 准备晚上考完了就发一封辩论信-----明天早晨就要上课了，过了明天似乎意义不大了

多谢！

刚考试完，没有看见一个回复，真伤心啊！！！

现在草拟了一个抗议，请大家斧正！ 我快睁不开眼了。。。明早发出。 多谢

Objection

In his answer to XXXXX, Mr. XXX uses the phrases “Aggression of China into Indian territories” and “Sino Tibetan relations”. I am strongly against this.

1. Because of the boundary questions China and India had a war in 1962 in border area. There is NO aggression of China into India. Now the two countries are working together to seek a solution. See Declaration on Principles for Relations and Comprehensive Cooperation Between the People's Republic of China and the Republic of India (2003/06/25)

The two sides exchanged views on the China-India boundary question and expounded their respective positions. They reiterated their readiness to seek a fair, reasonable and mutually acceptable solution through consultations on an equal footing. The two sides agreed that pending an ultimate solution, they should work together to maintain peace and tranquility in the border areas, and reiterated their commitment to continue implementation of the agreements signed for this purpose, including the clarification of the line of actual control.

2. The phrase “Sino Tibetan relations” may mislead people to misunderstand the status of Tibet. See also Declaration on Principles for Relations and Comprehensive Cooperation Between the People's Republic of China and the Republic of India (2003/06/25)

.

The Indian side recognizes that the Tibet Autonomous Region is part of the territory of the People's Republic of China and reiterates that it does not allow Tibetans to engage in anti-China political activities in India. The Chinese side expresses its appreciation for the Indian position and reiterates that it is firmly opposed to any attempt and action aimed at splitting China and bringing about "independence of Tibet".

It is a pity that this happened on the context that Both national leaders jointly announced that this year is Sino-India Friendship year.

For further information, see

http://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/wjdt/2649/t22852.htm