主题：【原创】揭穿一个流传已久的谎话帖，关于美国持枪自由 -- zhang11
共:💬89 🌺104
District of Columbia v. Heller判词里提到
The dissenting opinion, written by Justice Stevens, stated that:
The question presented by this case is not whether the Second Amendment protects a “collective right” or an “individual right.” Surely it protects a right that can be enforced by individuals. But a conclusion that the Second Amendment protects an individual right does not tell us anything about the scope of that right.[151]
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 3 层
🙂当然有玩炮的 配额他 字200 2010-03-13 09:05:45
🙂美国宪法毕竟是一个历史文本，各项修正案也是 frnkl 字196 2010-03-12 07:52:38
🙂国会立新法就是另一回事了 牛腰 字162 2010-03-12 08:03:09
🙂未来对第二修正案解释变化可能从这里出发
🙂这个要看将来这方面的案子的上诉结果了 牛腰 字0 2010-03-12 08:58:43
🙂这一点应该提到 frnkl 字681 2010-03-12 08:51:57
🙂您说到点子上了 大秦猛士 字122 2010-03-12 00:36:00
🙂真的持枪拒捕，那就是当场击毙了 酥油茶 字14 2010-03-15 13:58:13