主题：【原创】马萨诸塞红蓝易色之后 -- 晨枫

这完全就是共和党众议员Ron Paul的政治主张嘛。他还主张个人所得税非法，应该废除。美国内战是个错误，应该给奴隶主们付钱给奴隶赎身而不是打仗。美国受基地攻击是因为自己的对外政策太有攻击性，到处插手太多，应该把军事基地里的人都撤回来。

这家伙08年作为共和党总统候选人初选的时候，网上的得票率总是最高的，他的支持者也都非常的aggressive。可是现实得票率惨的惊人，辩论的时候他在一帮共和党候选人里面显得极其另类，被Fox新闻台和其他共和党参选人当笑话看。

我个人是他的FAN，当时是我唯一喜欢的一个总统候选人。可惜啊，美国人网上的意见也没用。

It is a dangerous to be an unfriendly neighbor of major nations.

America did intervene in Canada's domestic politics... I know several precedents. Canadian politicians have gotten the best terms for Canada.

export-oriented economic growth.

Those nations were supported by America with market opening and easy technology transfer. Russia did not enjoy such treatment.

Never underestimate the importance of US market.

我说是儒家文化在起作用，你还不同意，纳闷。

--Friend, live for a while in North America/Europe and read more extensively about the economic growth in UK/US between 1850-1940s. You will gradually change your mind.

儒家文化在起作用 might be a factor, but definitely NOT the main driver at all. Otherwise, why Ming and Qing were not industrialized high-growth nations?

极端一下就是minarchism了

your English writing is colossally fine. I really admire your language proficiency, which you obviously acquired by reading tons of materials in original.

my writing is just so so. I met some young Chinese professionals working at Wall Street. Their writing is much better than mine. 江后浪推前浪,一代新人胜前人. My generation can only specialize in IT/Math-intensive fields. The younger generation of Chinese students have entered tougher fields such as journalism, political science, communications... Their oral communication skill is amazing. They are more self-confident and open than us.

I once tried to post on Chinese forum in Chinese, but it was time consuming and I often bumped into "forbidden words" and my whole post sometimes never appeared on forum.

I figure that it might be much more difficult to filter posts in English ^-^ Chinese wan te do not have such expertise yet. ^-^

书店里面倒是有很多历史书籍，但是感觉像是通俗读物，而且都是把某个时代或者某个名人拿出来讲。

从一部电影跑到这个结果，对我来说实在是太戏剧化了。

我看老美的liberal都快疯了，一片狂骂。

NYT上他们提到的反制手段有：

1. Repair the presidential public finance system and create another one Congressional elections to help ordinary American contribute to campaigns.

2. Enact a law requiring corporations to get the approval of their shareholders before spending on political campaigns

3. Overturn court’s ruling

1.2. 好做,可不会有本质效果。 3. 没有什么切实的手段实现.

我想问一下:这个好消息的效果,有没有可能在美国体制内势力的相互牵制中被消弱?

危机中出现的可以是FDR,也可以是小胡子.

发挥利用到无以复加而且能在这个市场中取胜靠的我们的一系列特性，其中包括我们的某些文化基因，这起码使得我们的劳动力不但廉价而且优良。美国同样对非洲对拉美开放市场吧？菲律宾呢？引渡呢？我觉得（当然这不是我的什么创见了那个叫福柯什么的早搞过了什么凝聚力啦储蓄率啦）这是东亚社会相对其它文明形态成功的重要原因。

我觉得儒家是讲民本的（民为邦本本固邦宁）是讲平等的（彼既丈夫矣我亦丈夫尔）是讲进取的（天行健君子自强不息君子日日新）。清朝搞的那些专制愚民卖国和儒家有什么关系呢？

美国对加拿大经济的影响巨大，但控制就不大好说。军事上的控制不超过对一般北约盟国，NORAD除外。

其中一个法案就是麦坎恩资助的。

学生叫老师什么基本取决于学校或者老师自己的习惯。内子在高中当老师，她的学生在不同的班称呼老师就不一样。

奥地利学派或者极端市场自由派说出来都很好听很雄辩, 就是不 work. 作为一种哲学很吸引人, 但要按照他们的主张, 美国失业率现在可能还要高得多.

不过你的立场在河里也算比较独特了, 还是花一个.

选出他来也就是因为麻省的多数人对医疗改革和民主党不满罢了。布朗想要干长就只能定位在左翼右派的位置上，否则也就是一届任期吧。