主题：【原创】恐怖袭击,都是民主惹的祸 -- 风123
年仅21岁的堂弟在伊拉克被“冷血”杀害――
自美国军队进驻伊拉克以来，不时有美军滥杀无辜的新闻见诸报端。美国高层对此反复重申，美国士兵的行为多是自卫之举，而军方对美军犯罪嫌疑人的调查大多不了了之。
在这种政策下，伊驻联合国大使的堂弟可能是美军枪口下的另一个新冤魂。
美国兵笑着离开
美联社2日报道说，伊拉克驻联合国大使萨米尔?苏迈迪在给朋友的一封信中说，自己年仅21岁的堂弟穆罕默德?苏迈迪6月25日被美军在搜查行动中“冷血”杀害。
苏迈迪大使说，事发时堂弟在伊西部安巴尔省农村的家中探望家人，10余名进行搜查的美军海军陆战队士兵正好敲到他家的门。美军问这个年轻人家中有没有武器，穆罕默德把陆战队员带到了父亲的卧室，向美军展示了一把没有子弹的莱福枪。
但接下来，美军拽着穆罕默德?苏迈迪弟弟的头发把他拖到走廊，对这个年轻人拳脚相加。大约一个小时后，美军要离开时，他们的翻译用阿拉伯语问穆罕默德?苏迈迪的母亲他的儿子是否还在屋内，在得到肯定回答后，翻译告诉她：“他们已杀了他！”
大使在信中说：“母亲发出了撕心裂肺的哭声，而美国兵离开时则相视而笑。等母亲和孩子走进卧室后发现的只是穆罕默德?苏迈迪的尸体和早已凝固的鲜血，一颗子弹洞穿了他的脖子。”大使对凶案极其愤怒
大使说：“我对此事绝不怀疑，因为我已经弄确切了，这是严重的罪行，而这种罪行可能在安巴尔省四处重演。”他表示，这一凶案的影响无论对美国还是伊拉克都“极其严重”。
美国在伊发言人理查德?格雷内尔说：“美国驻伊代理大使接到了伊拉克大使的电话，他对这种可怕情况表示由衷哀悼，并已经同国务院和五角大楼官员进行接触，要求立即关注这一事件。”同以前美军杀害平民事件曝光后美军的表态一样，美军的这位发言人也称，这一事件涉及的是“联军部队”。马震（新华社供本报特稿）
Iraqi Ambassador Accuses U.S. Marines of Killing His Unarmed Cousin
By Edith M. Lederer Associated Press Writer
Published: Jul 1, 2005
Advertisement
UNITED NATIONS (AP) - Iraq's U.N. ambassador accused U.S. Marines of killing his unarmed young cousin in what appeared to be "cold blood" and demanded an investigation and punishment for the perpetrators.
In an e-mail to friends obtained Friday by The Associated Press, Ambassador Samir Sumaidaie said the killing took place in his ancestral village in western Anbar province, where U.S.-led forces have been conducting a counterinsurgency sweep aimed at disrupting the flow of foreign militants into Iraq.
His cousin Mohammed Al-Sumaidaie, 21, a university student, was killed June 25 when he took Marines doing house-to-house searches to a bedroom to show them where a rifle which had no live ammuntion was kept, the ambassador said. When the Marines left, he was found in the bedroom with a bullet in his neck.
Richard Grenell, spokesman for the U.S. Mission, said acting U.S. ambassador Anne Patterson received a call from the Iraqi ambassador "and expressed her heartfelt condolences on this terrible situation, and contacted senior State Department and Pentagon officials to look into the matter immediately."
Sumaidaie said the killing represents "a betrayal" of the values and aspirations of Iraqis and Americans to defeat the terrorists and build a country based on freedom, democracy, and respect for human rights and the rule of law.
"It is a betrayal of the American people who are making huge sacrifices to bring this about, and a betrayal of Iraq and all Iraqi patriots who have put their trust in the United States," he said.
In the letter, Sumaidaie gave a detailed account of the tragedy.
Mohammed, an engineering student at the University of Techology in Baghdad, was visiting his family in the village of Al-Shaikh Hadid when the Marines knocked on the door, the ambassador said.
The young man rushed to open the door and greeted the group of about 10 Marines and an interpreter who appeared to be Egyptian pleasantly, "happy to exercise some of his English," he said.
The Marines asked if there were any weapons, and Mohammed said there was a rifle, which only had blanks, the letter said. He then led some of the Marines into his father's bedroom where it was kept, Sumaidaie wrote. His father, the local headmaster, was at school.
A short time later, his mother, brothers and sisters who were kept in the living room heard a thud but they were generally relaxed because they had nothing to hide, and "they thought, nothing to fear," he said.
But later a younger brother, Ali, was dragged by the hair into the corridor by a Marine and was beaten. The mother started sobbing. A Marine then went out and returned with a camera and went into the bedroom. After a while, the family went outside and waited on the porch as they were ordered, the ambassador said.
More than an hour later, as the soldiers were leaving, the interpreter asked the mother in Arabic if that was her son inside. When she replied "yes," the interpreter said, "they killed him!," Sumaidaie said.
"The mother let off a deafening cry of anguish, but the Marines were smiling at each other as they were leaving," he said. "In the bedroom, Mohammed was found dead and laying in a clotted pool of his blood. A single bullet had penetrated his neck," the ambassador said.
The ambassador wrote that he believed "a serious crime has been commited - a crime that may be repeated up and down Al-Anbar" and demanded an investigation into what he said appeared to be the "killing of an unarmed innocent civilian - a cold blood murder."
AP-ES-07-01-05 2112EDT
民主国家一般杀的都是别人，独裁国家杀的首先是自己人？
不管你是否落后，是否能够翻身，在一个不能明目张胆地杀害自己人的集体里，生存的几率都要大一点。
这一点在任何时代都有效。
向楼下的李根河友道歉，我的帖子在你这一分支确实跑题了。
你当然的是对的。但是，不是所有人都有选择的啊！既然这个地球永远都是百分之二十统治百分之八十，我们又何必在优势打压劣势的时候喝彩，又何必在劣势反抗优势的时候惊诧呢？要知道，在食物链上，我们的屁股还是要离弱者近一些，这种状况至少我们有生之年不会有太大的改变。
至于致歉之说就不必了。跑题这种技术问题，谁都难免一点，尤其是在敏感话题上。反正网上的争论只是为了各自摆出自己的观点立场，谁试图说服谁都是不可取的。只要愿意交流讨论，大家都是河友。
“美国实行最完善的民主制度，英国是民主的发源地”--2句话都错了
正好我们也可以长一下见识，真理总是越辩越明的。
他这个道理要是正确的，鬼子在中国残杀百姓，岂不也有同样的借口了？
一个这样的新理论出来的时候，不能光看把它怎么用就能让自己爽的一面。注意一下平衡吧
小日本鬼子杀咱们老百姓和“恐怖分子”杀害西方百姓有一个最大的不同在于：
中国当时并没有侵略日本干涉日本内政；而英美是不是先主动招惹人家的呢？
那些抵抗组织不可能和美英联军面对面战斗，那不是找死么？而且当年美国从越南撤军，美国国内的舆论起到了重要的作用，恐怖分子不会不知道吧？
如果美国入侵中国，在美的华人如果在美国下毒扔炸弹，是不是要受到咱们这些民主理智人士的谴责呢？
事不关己，当然可以道貌岸然的。可是当你面对国将不国的切肤之痛时，是否还可以有这份“爱心”呢？