主题：【原创】我所认识的基督教 -- 数字马甲
如果压根就是一个独立的组织，那外人自然无从置喙。问题是，中国的天主教会承认教皇和罗马教廷的权威吧？我承认你的领导地位，但就是不听你的指挥。是否有些不尴尬呢？
不要误解我的意思。我是坚决反对梵蒂冈插手中国事务的。但事总得讲个名正言顺是吧。
该派当信当行的教义、教规，由中国天主教主教团确定。该派不承认罗马教庭及教皇的权威。
有关这方面的法律和宗教教义上的解释，中国法律专家和中国天主教徒已经搞得很清楚了。
多谢。我方的声音是在太微弱了，总是让一帮海外政客们占据道德制高点似的。
俺就是向各位陈述一下客观情况，谈不上我方他方。本人没有立场，只想搞清楚事实。
俺不喜欢美国，但不会盲目骂美。这倒不是看在我朋友煮酒的面子上。毕竟美国是一个伟大的国家，尊重这个国家是惟一的选择。
同样呢，俺真的不喜欢天主教，但不会攻击这个古老的宗教，只愿意如实陈述。
旧西藏也是政教合一的。。。当然它不是一个国家。
一神教的特点就是独尊独大，非我族类其心必诛。所以不同（哪怕是同根的）一神教之间就要针尖对麦芒了，现代所谓的文明冲突就是这样。
后一句不知道，我对西方文化没什么了解。前一句我倒觉得，它是有它深厚的文化背景的。
首先道歉一下，我的语调可能冒犯了一些人。我会多注意一些。
我的很多信息来自Richard Dawkins的一本书《The God Delusion》。Richard Dawkins是当代最著名的无神论者之一，他本身是杰出的进化论专家。他的书显然是反宗教的，所以他的观点也许会有偏颇。我只是摘录其中的几段供大家讨论。
<The Gold Delusion> p254 Love Thy Neighbour
(this paragraph refers to John Hartung's research http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/taboos/ltn01.html)
Hartung's interpretation of the Bible suggests that it offers no grounds for such smug complacency among Christians (that they will "disappear" into heaven when the "end time" comes). Jesus limited his in-group of the saved strictly to Jews, in which respect he was following the Old Testament tradition, which was all he knew. Hartung clearly shows that 'Thou shalt not kill' was never intended to mean what we now think it means. It meant, very specifically, thou shalt not kill Jews. And all those commandments that make reference to 'they neighbour' are equally exclusive. 'Neighbour' means fellow Jew. Moses Mainmonides, the highly repected twelfth-centry rabbi and physician, expounds the full meaning of 'Thou shalt not kill' as follows: 'if one slays a single Israelite, he transgresses a negative commandment, for Scripture says, Thou shalt not murder. If one Murders wilfully in the presence of witnesses, he is put to death by the sword. Needless to say, one is not put to death if he kills a heathen." Needless to say!
.... what if he were to throw a stone into a group of nie heathens and one Israelite and have the misfortune to kill the Israelite? Hm, difficult! But the answer is ready. 'Then his nonliability can be inferred from the fact that the majority were heathens.'
very reasonable.
说的很好。关于宗教的起源，确实有很多从心理学的角度来解释的。有一本书《In Gods We Trust》by Scott Atran，就是从心理学和进化论的角度来阐述宗教的起源。我现在还没有时间和耐心读完。
另外你说的各种宗教的态度观，似乎很像梁淑凕的看法（《佛学大意》）。他说基督教是向前看，儒教是注重现世，佛家是向后看－－从根本上消结问题。记得不是太清楚，希望有高人来补充补充。