主题:茗谈(126):庖丁解牛 -- 本嘉明
真是张口就来,错误多得不忍直视……
随便说一个吧:
这么喜欢看英文,就给你看段英文吧:
14. Mr Fung, SC, for the Government submits that a generous and purposive approach is to be adopted in the interpretation of the Basic Law since it is a constitutional document. See A.G. of Gambia v. Jobe [1984]AC 689 and R. v. Sin Yau-ming [1992] 1 HKCLR 127. While I agree with this as a general proposition, I would add a few words of caution. The Basic Law is a unique document. It reflects a treaty made between two nations. It deals with the relationship between the Sovereign and an autonomous region which practises a different system. It stipulates the organisations and functions of the different branches of government. It sets out the rights and obligations of the citizens. Hence, it has at least three dimensions : international, domestic and constitutional. It must also be borne in mind that it was not drafted by common law lawyers. It was drafted in the Chinese language with an official English version but the Chinese version takes precedence in case of discrepancies. That being the background and features of the Basic Law, it is obvious that there will be difficulties in the interpretation of its various provisions.
看明白了吗?这说的是《基本法》是以中文起草,英文版本是附赠的,如果有争议,以中文为准。
再看你说的哪个神秘的elections,这是基本法的英文版:
http://www.chinalawedu.com/news/23223/23228/2007/1/zh2793444916181700219888-0.htm
你自己看看elections用在哪里。
用基本法为所谓的“真普选”背书,估计也就你能干出来。再说什么叫真普选,公民提名就是真普选?
看一个法盲谈法治,真的是太有喜感了。
- 相关回复 上下关系8
压缩 2 层
🙂我觉得对于有钱人来说,姓资姓社还是很重要的。 名不正,则 fw 字95 2014-09-25 16:57:04
🙂香港的几乎全部土地属于港府所有 2 陈王奋起 字77 2014-09-24 21:07:21
🙂我听说北美也是99年产权的,只是无力查证 小书童 字0 2014-09-30 11:57:38
🙂以其昏昏 使人昭昭
🙂看一个法盲谈法治,真的是太有喜感了。 Gr18Ni9Ti 字68 2014-09-24 14:32:20
🙂谢谢指教 4 本嘉明 字586 2014-09-24 12:42:43
🙂“鸟笼选举”应该是新加坡成功的制度关键吧? 林风清逸 字0 2014-10-04 18:23:22
🙂我为什么要说服闹事港人呢? 77 烤面包的胖大叔 字1245 2014-09-24 20:48:23